> In summary, this is not a bug - the log uses the package architecture, not > the version architecture. If you need the version architecture, you need > to reconstruct it in a different way. Thanks for the information, I understand, that this is not a bug and already found a workaround. Is there some documentation about the difference between package architecture and version architecture? What I still miss to understand: Implementation details aside, would there be any disadvantage, if apt used the version architecture for foo:all instead of the package architecture in history.log? In my (obviously incomplete) understanding the user could always conclude from "all" that they can use any architecture, but cannot conclude from "amd64" whether the package is architecture-independent. Kind regards Patrick
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.