On Sun, 2019-09-08 at 10:32 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > On Sat, Sep 07, 2019 at 07:07:37PM -0700, Kip Warner wrote: > An alternative is to have an 'After' field. It would not specify any > dependency relationship between packages, only an ordering one. You'd > have to specify a package in Recommends and After, but you could also > specify it in Suggests and After, or just generically ensure your > package is configured after some other package. > > It's more versatile, at the expense of more typing. I think that is a sound idea. It obviates the potential need for an eventual Pre-Suggests as well. -- Kip Warner | Senior Software Engineer OpenPGP signed/encrypted mail preferred https://www.thevertigo.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part