Your message dated Fri, 14 Aug 2015 15:55:33 +0200 with message-id <20150814135533.GA29692@crossbow> and subject line Re: Bug#265641: apt: uninstalled, pinned packages hide packages from available list has caused the Debian Bug report #265641, regarding apt: uninstalled, pinned packages hide packages from available list to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 265641: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=265641 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: apt: uninstalled, pinned packages hide packages from available list
- From: Joshua Neal <jneal@csdaily.com>
- Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 01:15:35 -0700
- Message-id: <20040814081535.GA31623@csdaily.com>
Package: apt Version: 0.5.27 Severity: normal If you have packages pinned in /etc/apt/preferences, and those packages are not installed, then apt-cache will silently remove that package from its list of available packages (as in the 'apt-cache dumpavail' option), and apt-get install will declare that the package is not available. Yet frustratingly enough, 'apt-cache show' will display the package information and 'apt-get source' will work happily. I understand this is probably correct behavior, but in my case these entries were added to /etc/apt/preferences by apt-listbugs long ago, so it was entirely non-obvious as to why it was not working. Example from /etc/apt/preferences: Explanation: Pinned by apt-listbugs at Fri Jan 30 02:08:57 PST 2004 Package: wine Pin: version 0.0.20030813-2 Pin-Priority: 1000 -- Package-specific info: -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages apt depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:3.4.1-5 GCC support library ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.4-7 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 265641-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#265641: apt: uninstalled, pinned packages hide packages from available list
- From: David Kalnischkies <david@kalnischkies.de>
- Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 15:55:33 +0200
- Message-id: <20150814135533.GA29692@crossbow>
- In-reply-to: <20041228021608.GU7551@alcor.net>
- References: <20040814081535.GA31623@csdaily.com> <20041228021608.GU7551@alcor.net>
Hi, On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 06:16:08PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 01:15:35AM -0700, Joshua Neal wrote: > > If you have packages pinned in /etc/apt/preferences, and those packages > > are not installed, then apt-cache will silently remove that package from > > its list of available packages (as in the 'apt-cache dumpavail' option), > > and apt-get install will declare that the package is not available. Yet > > frustratingly enough, 'apt-cache show' will display the package > > information and 'apt-get source' will work happily. > > > > I understand this is probably correct behavior, but in my case these > > entries were added to /etc/apt/preferences by apt-listbugs long ago, so > > it was entirely non-obvious as to why it was not working. > > > > Example from /etc/apt/preferences: > > > > Explanation: Pinned by apt-listbugs at Fri Jan 30 02:08:57 PST 2004 > > Package: wine > > Pin: version 0.0.20030813-2 > > Pin-Priority: 1000 > > That does not sound like correct behaviour. Please send a transcript > demonstrating exactly what you mean, so that I can try to reproduce the bug. No reproducibility in 11 years doesn't make me expect it to be suddently possible in the near future, hence closing as not actionable. Best regards David KalnischkiesAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---