[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#675827: marked as done (apt-utils: apt-ftparchive.conf example file incorrect for apt-file friendly output)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Aug 2015 15:56:21 +0200
with message-id <20150811135621.GA8459@crossbow>
and subject line Re: Bug#675827: closed by Michael Vogt <mvo@debian.org> (Bug#675827: fixed in apt 0.9.6)
has caused the Debian Bug report #675827,
regarding apt-utils: apt-ftparchive.conf example file incorrect for apt-file friendly output
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
675827: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675827
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: apt-utils
Version: 0.9.5.1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

The example at /usr/share/doc/apt-utils/examples/apt-ftparchive.conf 
will generate the Contents file to the root of $(DIST) tree. This is
not where 'apt-file update' expects to find it. Instead, it wants it 
at the root of $(SECTION). The attached patch fixes it accordingly.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=fi_FI.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages apt-utils depends on:
ii  libapt-inst1.5  0.9.5.1
ii  libapt-pkg4.12  0.9.5.1
ii  libc6           2.13-32
ii  libdb5.1        5.1.29-4
ii  libgcc1         1:4.7.0-11
ii  libstdc++6      4.7.0-11

apt-utils recommends no packages.

Versions of packages apt-utils suggests:
ii  xz-utils  5.1.1alpha+20110809-3

-- no debconf information

--- a/usr/share/doc/apt-utils/examples/apt-ftparchive.conf	2011-06-17 13:10:20.000000000 +0300
+++ b/usr/share/doc/apt-utils/examples/apt-ftparchive.conf	2012-06-03 17:59:35.330121443 +0300
@@ -21,21 +21,21 @@ Default {
 BinDirectory "pool/main" {
 	Packages "dists/sid/main/binary-i386/Packages";
 	Sources "dists/sid/main/source/Sources";
-	Contents "dists/sid/Contents-i386";
+	Contents "dists/sid/main/Contents-i386";
 }
 
 // This is the same for the contrib section
 BinDirectory "pool/contrib" {
 	Packages "dists/sid/contrib/binary-i386/Packages";
 	Sources "dists/sid/contrib/source/Sources";
-	Contents "dists/sid/Contents-i386";
+	Contents "dists/sid/contrib/Contents-i386";
 }
 
 // This is the same for the non-free section
 BinDirectory "pool/non-free" {
 	Packages "dists/sid/non-free/binary-i386/Packages";
 	Sources "dists/sid/non-free/source/Sources";
-	Contents "dists/sid/Contents-i386";
+	Contents "dists/sid/non-free/Contents-i386";
 };
 
 // By default all Packages should have the extension ".deb"

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi,

On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 07:31:54PM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> 2012/6/17 David Kalnischkies <kalnischkies+debian@gmail.com>:
> > On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Martin-Éric Racine
> > <martin-eric.racine@iki.fi> wrote:
> >> This bug was incorrectly marked as fixed. It is not, since
> >> /usr/share/doc/apt-utils/examples/apt-ftparchive.conf still contains
> >> incorrect information. Please check the patch I submitted with the
> >> original bug report. Thanks!
> >
> > Are you sure?
> > The file on my system reads like you requested…
> > (ensure you really have the apt-utils package in version 0.9.6 installed)
> >
> > I just changed more places (like the one mentioned on in the changelog)
> > so that it is the default for apt-ftparchive and also written in the manpage
> > and just mentioned the change only for the binary as this has an effect
> > for a user in contrast to the change in the example file or the manpage.
> 
> Argh! Sure enough, this particular host had an older version
> installed. Sorry about that!

As this bug was indeed closes, lets close it for good finally. :)


Best regards

David Kalnischkies

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: