Re: --> APT's New Version <--
Hi,
If I remember correctly aptitude and apt-get do not use the same data
base for keeping track of packages which where only installed to fulfill
dependencies of other packages. Is this still true in general and
specifically with apt?
Cheers,
Bastian
On 01.04.2014 17:39, The deity team wrote:
> After much discussion, the deity team has now picked an official
> stanza on what a version number says about the stability and quality
> of a software product:
>
> 16 years after the initial announcement[0] we are pleased to announce
> apt in version "1.0.0.0b" as a birthday present to everyone caring
> deeply about numbers.
>
> Everyone else will find in this beta^Wbinary release the fulfilment of
> a longstanding dream: /usr/bin/apt provided by apt rather than java.
>
> We want to thank the java community for deprecating their "Annotation
> Processing Tool" a long time ago and the java maintainers for
> preparing the takeover by us.
>
> Our newest addition to the apt family is intended as a user interface
> and comes therefore bundled with a bunch of configuration and
> interface changes compared to its siblings – but we don't want to blow
> the surprise, so play with it for yourself! No worries through,
> /usr/bin/apt-* will keep working just as before.
>
> But a word of caution: the "/usr/bin/apt" binary is still work in
> progress, so now is the time to speak up if you miss features or find
> bugs and patch the hell out of/into it for a nice Debian
> freeze&release in November. :)
>
>
> 16 years old and still ever changing: Not even the name remains
> stable. What used to be called "deity" was announced as "Apt", first
> released as "APT" [1], shipped as "apt-get" and "apt-cache",
> interpreted as "A Package Tool" and "Advanced Package Tool" and is now
> also available as "apt" … But the initial wisdom holds: "it's still a
> good word in its own right". And this word has surely influenced the
> way we manage our software on phones, servers and space stations. It
> also still stirs envy among users and developers outside the Debian
> universe – and rightly so! ;)
>
> This would not have been possible without contributions by hundreds of
> people in code, documentation, translations, bugreports and support!
> Thank YOU for all this work – and please keep it coming! :)
>
> A very special thanks also goes out to the original authors: Your
> little baby is now a sweet teenager who can legally drink beer! [2]
>
> Who would have guessed that 16 years ago? Do you remember what you did
> on the first April in 1998? What is the first thing you thought while
> reading this mail? And most important of all: Have you mooed today?
>
> It is "Sweet 16"-APT-1.0-Release-Partytime, so feel free to join the
> fun and tell us your answers or anything else you want to share!
> deity@lists.debian.org and #debian-apt are waiting for you.
>
>
> Best regards and: Moo!
>
> Your APT Development Team
>
> [0] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/1998/04/msg00027.html
> [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/1998/04/msg00274.html
> [2] based on current team member origins. Your mileage may vary.
> We recommend tea (with a lacing of milk maybe) while working apt
> though. Super cow recommends that you smash some milk instead.
>
>
--
Bastian Venthur http://venthur.de
Debian Developer venthur at debian org
Reply to: