On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 03:14:24PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Package: apt > Version: 0.9.14 > Severity: important > > ypig:~> apt-show-versions -a binutils > binutils:amd64 2.24-1+local1 install ok installed > binutils:amd64 2.22-8 wheezy ftp.fr.debian.org > binutils:amd64 2.23.90.20131017-1 testing ftp.fr.debian.org > binutils:amd64 2.24-2 unstable ftp.fr.debian.org > No experimental version > binutils:amd64/unstable 2.24-1+local1 upgradeable to 2.24-2 > > but > > ypig:~> apt-get source -t unstable binutils > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree > Reading state information... Done > Selectied version '2.23.52.20130612-1' (unstable) for binutils > [...] I can reproduce this, but only with: $ apt-get source -t unstable binutils the supposed-to-be identical alternative: $ apt-get source -t sid binutils works out as intended. Looks like apt-get believes it has no binary records for unstable and takes the first version it finds in Sources – which in this case offers three different versions. That binutils:amd64 isn't working anymore sounds like different (but related) regression. Seems like Michael broke more than he fixed in an effort to support deb-src without deb entries. Word of the day: Testcase(s) ;) Best regards David Kalnischkies
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature