On Friday, 19. April 2013 17:51:36 Julien Cristau wrote: > On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 18:17:00 +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote: > > I have done very few tests, but it seems like bringing > > openoffice.org-core back (as a transitional package) is the simplest > > workaround. If I remember right all status-files I have seen so far about ... > > (Such a transition package needs to break at least > > "openoffice.org-report-builder-bin" as it is otherwise not removed > > on upgrade. I have no idea what else / how depends should look like) > > I've tried to build a transitional openoffice.org-core package, but > either I did it wrong (quite possible) or it doesn't help. I tried reintroducing openoffice.org-core as a transitional package myself (patch attached). While adding the package does not produce upgrade regressions, it does not fix this issue here either. BTW, there is yet another set of these immediate-configuration issues in #677805: E: Could not perform immediate configuration on 'python-sugar-toolkit-0.88'. That should probably be merged with this bug. Andreas
Attachment:
openoffice.org_3.4.0~ooo340m1-5.1.dsc.diff.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data