Bug#644104: Spelling error in apt.conf.8 man page
Package: apt
Version: 0.7.25.3ubuntu9.7
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
There is a spelling mistake in the apt.conf.8 man page. The following
patch can be applied to the main tree.
=== modified file 'doc/apt.conf.5.xml'
--- doc/apt.conf.5.xml 2011-09-05 13:58:19 +0000
+++ doc/apt.conf.5.xml 2011-10-02 20:40:19 +0000
@@ -294,7 +294,7 @@
<para>Two sub-options to limit the use of PDiffs are also available:
With <literal>FileLimit</literal> can be specified how many PDiff files
are downloaded at most to patch a file. <literal>SizeLimit</literal>
- on the other hand is the maximum precentage of the size of all patches
+ on the other hand is the maximum percentage of the size of all patches
compared to the size of the targeted file. If one of these limits is
exceeded the complete file is downloaded instead of the patches.
</para></listitem>
-- Package-specific info:
-- (no /etc/apt/preferences present) --
-- (/etc/apt/sources.list present, but not submitted) --
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers lucid-updates
APT policy: (500, 'lucid-updates'), (500, 'lucid-security'), (500, 'lucid')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.34-m64-mb1 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages apt depends on:
ii libc6 2.11.1-0ubuntu7.8 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii libgcc1 1:4.4.3-4ubuntu5 GCC support library
ii libstdc++6 4.4.3-4ubuntu5 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
Versions of packages apt recommends:
ii ubuntu-keyring 2010.11.09 GnuPG keys of the Ubuntu archive
Versions of packages apt suggests:
pn apt-doc <none> (no description available)
ii aptitude 0.4.11.11-1ubuntu10 terminal-based package manager
ii bzip2 1.0.5-4ubuntu0.1 high-quality block-sorting file co
ii dpkg-dev 1.15.5.6ubuntu4.5 Debian package development tools
ii lzma 4.43-14ubuntu2 Compression method of 7z format in
ii python-apt 0.7.94.2ubuntu6.4 Python interface to libapt-pkg
-- no debconf information
Reply to: