Quoting David Kalnischkies (kalnischkies+debian@gmail.com): > > s/The following package is/The following package was/ > > You are right the first is should be replaced with was… (silly me). > > Still changing it now would interfere with Christian Perriers > i18n work he started yesterday, so better wait a bit, right? I found *many* other things to fix in English messages, I'm afraid. It was hard to report them and I may go around the PO files to check this. As you suspect, yes it will interfere. The trick to fix this without fuzzyting translations is to cleverly replace to offending error in "msgid", in PO files, before doing the change in the source and regenerate the PO(T) files. I usually do this with sed. The trick is finding a search and replace expression that only fits the place were the error was.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature