Bug#591881: vlc-nox: package fails to upgrade properly from lenny
Hey dear APT team,
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 15:53:05 (CEST), Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 08:11:02 (EDT), Julian Andres Klode wrote:
>
>> If you move the Breaks from libavformat52 to libavcodec52 and depend on
>> the libavcodec52 with that breaks, it will work.
>
> That would be this patch:
>
> commit 898820f21f6e25e71d9effb059183e0c2f275ff5
> Author: Reinhard Tartler <siretart@tauware.de>
> Date: Sat Aug 7 09:47:56 2010 -0400
>
> Move breaks declaration from libavformat to libavcodec to help the apt solver, Closes: #591881
>
> diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
> index 6ca949f..260932e 100644
> --- a/debian/control
> +++ b/debian/control
> @@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ Architecture: any
> Depends: ${shlibs:Depends},
> ${misc:Depends}
> Replaces: ffmpeg (<< 4:0.5.1-1)
> +Breaks: libavcodec51 (<< 3:0.svn20090303-1)
> Description: ffmpeg codec library
> This is the codec library from the ffmpeg project. It supports most existing
> encoding formats (MPEG, DivX, MPEG4, AC3, DV...).
> @@ -113,7 +114,6 @@ Package: libavformat52
> Architecture: any
> Depends: ${shlibs:Depends},
> ${misc:Depends}
> -Breaks: libavcodec51 (<< 3:0.svn20090303-1)
> Description: ffmpeg file format library
> This is the demuxer library from the ffmpeg project. It supports most
> existing file formats (AVI, MPEG, OGG, Matroska, ASF...).
>
> The ffmpeg packages ensures "strict" internal dependencies anyway, so
> AFAIUI, this should work.
>
>> On the APT side, this patch can fix it; but I am not sure whether it
>> will break other cases of Breaks:
>>
>> === modified file 'apt-pkg/algorithms.cc'
>> --- apt-pkg/algorithms.cc 2010-06-09 09:51:21 +0000
>> +++ apt-pkg/algorithms.cc 2010-08-07 12:05:04 +0000
>> @@ -992,11 +992,12 @@ bool pkgProblemResolver::Resolve(bool Br
>>
>> /* Try to fix the package under consideration rather than
>> fiddle with the VList package */
>> - if (Scores[I->ID] <= Scores[Pkg->ID] ||
>> + if ((Scores[I->ID] <= Scores[Pkg->ID] ||
>> ((Cache[Start] & pkgDepCache::DepNow) == 0 &&
>> End->Type != pkgCache::Dep::Conflicts &&
>> End->Type != pkgCache::Dep::DpkgBreaks &&
>> - End->Type != pkgCache::Dep::Obsoletes))
>> + End->Type != pkgCache::Dep::Obsoletes)) &&
>> + End->Type != pkgCache::Dep::DpkgBreaks )
>> {
>> // Try a little harder to fix protected packages..
>> if ((Flags[I->ID] & Protected) == Protected)
>
> Lucas told me yesterday that this affects ~80 other packages as well, is
> that correct? Can we expect to see this patch in squeeze, or shall I
> move the breaks as outlined above?
I'm still waiting for an answer on this question. Is this issue solved
with the latest upload, or do you prefer me to upload the patch posted
above?
--
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4
Reply to: