On 06-04 08:01, stefan.bauer@cubewerk.de wrote: > > ii ipsec-tools 1:0.7.3-6 IPsec tools for Linux > > ii racoon 1:0.7.3-6 IPsec IKE keying daemon > > # LC_ALL=C apt-get dist-upgrade -V > > Reading package lists... Done > > Building dependency tree > > Reading state information... Done > > Calculating upgrade... Done > > The following packages will be REMOVED: > > racoon (0.7.3-7) > > The following packages will be upgraded: > > ipsec-tools (0.7.3-6 => 0.7.3-7) > > Witold, > > it jumps to my mind, that this could be a bug in apt. How is the output if > you use aptitude? Its weird, dpkg shows correctly 0.7.3-6 installed. apt > wants to get rid of 0.7.3-7 which is not even installed at the moment. It is problem in racoon package description: $ apt-get install racoon -V ... The following extra packages will be installed: ipsec-tools (0.7.3-7) The following packages will be REMOVED: network-manager-strongswan (1.1.2-1) strongswan-ikev2 (4.3.2-1.3) strongswan-nm (4.3.2-1.3) The following packages will be upgraded: ipsec-tools (0.7.3-6 => 0.7.3-7) racoon (0.7.3-6 => 0.7.3-7) $ Oh, strongswan removed? $ apt-get install racoon strongswan-nm -V ... The following packages have unmet dependencies: racoon: Conflicts: ike-server E: Broken packages $ $ apt-cache show racoon | grep -E '(Version|Packa|Conflict|Provide)' Package: racoon Version: 1:0.7.3-7 Provides: ike-server Conflicts: ike-server Package: racoon Version: 1:0.7.3-6 Provides: ike-server $ Conflicts section in versin 1:0.7.3-7 is strange. Is is supposed to mean "we provide ike-server, but doesn't allow for any OTHER ike-server package"? It looks that APT understand this as "we provide ike-server, but we dosen't allow for any ike-server package, including me". Regards. -- Witold Baryluk JID: witold.baryluk // jabster.pl
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature