David Kalnischkies wrote: > Or in short: A package version has multiply pin-settings: > - a version specific one (e.g. 5.8*) > - one for each origin/release/distribution (e.g. sid or "") I don't understand this one. And anyway it isn't stated anywhere, so it doesn't count. > And this is btw what i expect with the given pin-file, > but your mileage may vary, of course. > (Or to rephrase it: how to get the same behavior in cupt?) > > I would therefore reassign the bug (again) to cupt and proceed > with improving the manpage in #557637 instead, but i don't want to > play bug-ping-pong. So what do you think Eugene V. Lyubimkin? So I don't get your point. Again: "Failing that, if any general-form records match an available package version then the first such record determines the priority of the package version", and cupt do exactly that. I definitely will not accept bug reports based on points like 'do what I mean, not what I say'. -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature