Daniel Burrows wrote: > What I'm wondering about is this: why doesn't he have a candidate > version for libjack0? He's running a testing system and has two > perfectly good available versions, including the installed version. > Shouldn't apt at least pick the installed version as the candidate? I think it definitely should. However I cannot reproduce the problem in my unstable system, so a new bug report with the attached dpkg status file would be helpful for anyone who will try to fix this problem. -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com Ukrainian C++ Developer, Debian Maintainer, APT contributor
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature