> You know, that you used /etc/apt/preferences _and_ APT::Default-Release > "unstable";? Why do you think, the resulting pin-priority is a bug? I > mean, you configured apt to use "unstable" as the default release. > Following apt_preferences(5) this release gets a priority of 990. IMHO For some reason I was under the impression, that APT::Default-Release would be overridden by the more-specific pin. I.e. default-release would apply only to those where nothing else does; a fall-back. Apparently I was mistaken. By the way, apt_preferences(5) does not seem to specify, which one is preferred, Default-Release or the pin if both match a package. Perhaps it should? > apt could be improved to assign "o=Debian,a=${APT::Default-Release > value}" (or similar) so third party repositories are not affected by the > APT::Default-Release value. I agree, that would be useful. -Juha -- ----------------------------------------------- | Juha Jäykkä, juolja@utu.fi | | home: http://www.utu.fi/~juolja/ | -----------------------------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature