also sprach Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> [2006.03.12.0419 +0100]: > > Pin: release o=Jeff Bailey,l=Jeff Bailey > > > > doesn't work at all. In fact, I can't seem to pin on any o= and l= > > fields of the release data. > > Right, that rings a bell. It does? It certainly seems like o= and l= are broken. I cannot find a bug report on this. Any pointers? > > It should not even apply. Default are pinned at 500, so any Ubuntu > > package will be 500. However, I specifically pin bzr to 50, and > > APT just ignores that. > > The problem is that it pins down the already installed package as > well. That should always be 100. It only does that when I specify a package name. With *, it does not pin already installed packages. #317186 > > Where did you get this information? In my book, I describe *** as > > denoting the candidate and I am quite sure that I didn't "make that > > up" but empirically determined it; I did not go and look at the > > source though. > > Just by looking at the output. I shall have to investigate. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org> : :' : proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP (sub)keys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! women can keep a secret just as well as men, but it takes more of them to do it.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)