Bug#388189: ImportError: .../apt_pkg.so: undefined symbol: _ZN15SHA256SummationC1Ev
Package: python-apt
Version: 0.6.19
Severity: important
I saw the "ImportError" message on a package installation
via aptutude. Looks like it does not affect the result, but
I'm not sure about it (and single *-doc package is probably
not a good test for full functionality).
max$ sudo aptitude install libglib2.0-doc
<skipped>
The following NEW packages will be installed:
libglib2.0-doc
0 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 764 not upgraded.
Need to get 700kB of archives. After unpacking 5235kB will be used.
Writing extended state information... Done
Get:1 http://<server name skipped> etch/main libglib2.0-doc 2.10.3-3 [700kB]
Fetched 700kB in 0s (2850kB/s)
Reading package fields... Done
Reading package status... Done
Retrieving bug reports... Done
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/apt-listchanges", line 30, in ?
import apt_pkg
ImportError: /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/apt_pkg.so: undefined symbol: _ZN15SHA256SummationC1Ev
Selecting previously deselected package libglib2.0-doc.
(Reading database ... 166588 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking libglib2.0-doc (from .../libglib2.0-doc_2.10.3-3_all.deb) ...
Setting up libglib2.0-doc (2.10.3-3) ...
max$ _
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.2
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-386
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.KOI8-R (charmap=KOI8-R)
Versions of packages python-apt depends on:
ii apt [libapt-pkg-libc6.3-6-3 0.6.43.3 Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii apt-utils [libapt-inst-libc 0.6.43.3 APT utility programs
ii libc6 2.3.6-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libgcc1 1:4.1.0-1+b1 GCC support library
ii libstdc++6 4.1.0-1+b1 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii python 2.4.3-11 An interactive high-level object-o
ii python-central 0.5.5 register and build utility for Pyt
python-apt recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
Reply to: