Bug#326725: marked as done (apt is missing build-dep on sgmltools-lite)
Your message dated Mon, 5 Sep 2005 17:53:52 +0200
with message-id <20050905155352.GA14415@top.ping.de>
and subject line Bug#326725: apt is missing build-dep on sgmltools-lite
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Sep 2005 11:10:18 +0000
>From max@duempel.org Mon Sep 05 04:10:17 2005
Return-path: <max@duempel.org>
Received: from duempel.org [81.209.165.42]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ECErh-0002oI-00; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 04:10:17 -0700
Received: (qmail 24053 invoked by uid 1001); 5 Sep 2005 13:09:09 +0200
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 13:09:09 +0200
From: Max Kellermann <max@duempel.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: apt is missing build-dep on sgmltools-lite
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20050905110909.GA24027@roonstrasse.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: apt
Version: 0.6.40.1
apt requires sgmltools-lite to compile, but this build dependency is
missing. Output from a failed build without sgmltools-lite:
[...]
Creating html for offline.sgml to ../build/docs/offline.html
nsgmls:/etc/sgml/catalog:193:8:E: cannot open
"/usr/share/sgml/stylesheet/dsssl/sgmltools/sgmltools.cat" (No such
file or directory)
nsgmls:/etc/sgml/catalog:193:8:E: cannot open
"/usr/share/sgml/stylesheet/dsssl/sgmltools/sgmltools.cat" (No such
file or directory)
nsgmls:/etc/sgml/catalog:193:8:E: cannot open
"/usr/share/sgml/stylesheet/dsssl/sgmltools/sgmltools.cat" (No such
file or directory)
nsgmls:/etc/sgml/catalog:193:8:E: cannot open
"/usr/share/sgml/stylesheet/dsssl/sgmltools/sgmltools.cat" (No such
file or directory)
nsgmls:/etc/sgml/catalog:193:8:E: cannot open
"/usr/share/sgml/stylesheet/dsssl/sgmltools/sgmltools.cat" (No such
file or directory)
nsgmls:/etc/sgml/catalog:193:8:E: cannot open
"/usr/share/sgml/stylesheet/dsssl/sgmltools/sgmltools.cat" (No such
file or directory)
nsgmls:/etc/sgml/catalog:193:8:E: cannot open
"/usr/share/sgml/stylesheet/dsssl/sgmltools/sgmltools.cat" (No such
file or directory)
nsgmls:/etc/sgml/catalog:193:8:E: cannot open
"/usr/share/sgml/stylesheet/dsssl/sgmltools/sgmltools.cat" (No such
file or directory)
make[2]: *** [../build/docs/dpkg-tech.html] Error 1
[...]
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 326725-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Sep 2005 15:54:28 +0000
>From sir.mvo@gmx.de Mon Sep 05 08:54:28 2005
Return-path: <sir.mvo@gmx.de>
Received: from mail.gmx.de (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ECJIh-0007XQ-00; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 08:54:28 -0700
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 05 Sep 2005 15:53:56 -0000
Received: from ip181.135.1511I-CUD12K-01.ish.de (EHLO top.ping.de) [62.143.135.181]
by mail.gmx.net (mp020) with SMTP; 05 Sep 2005 17:53:56 +0200
X-Authenticated: #18895133
Received: by top.ping.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 45B1B6F294; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 17:53:52 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 17:53:52 +0200
From: Michael Vogt <mvo@debian.org>
To: Max Kellermann <max@duempel.org>, 326725-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#326725: apt is missing build-dep on sgmltools-lite
Message-ID: <20050905155352.GA14415@top.ping.de>
References: <[🔎] 20050905110909.GA24027@roonstrasse.net> <[🔎] 20050905152450.GB14176@top.ping.de> <[🔎] 20050905153621.GA25446@roonstrasse.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20050905153621.GA25446@roonstrasse.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Delivered-To: 326725-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 05:36:21PM +0200, Max Kellermann wrote:
> On 2005/09/05 17:24, Michael Vogt <mvo@debian.org> wrote:
> > I'm unable to reproduce your problem, apt builds fine here in my
> > sid pbuilder.
> >
> > Maybe you tried to build apt directly from the tla/baz repository? In
> > this case there are more packages needed.
>
> No, I have pulled the sources by using "apt-get source" from sid.
>
> However, I have now found the cause of the bug - it is not in the apt
> package. There was an old entry in /etc/sgml/catalog:
>
> CATALOG /usr/share/sgml/stylesheet/dsssl/sgmltools/sgmltools.cat
>
> It seems like an old sgmltools-lite package registered this catalog,
> but never unregistered it. "sgmltools-lite.postinst"
> (3.0.3.0.cvs.20010909-13) contains a workaround - which unregisters
> /usr/lib/sgml/[...]/sgmltools.cat, not /usr/share/... - possibly it
> should unregister both.
>
> This bug report is mistaken and can be closed, at least for apt.
Thanks, for investigating this further.
I close this bug now.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Linux is not The Answer. Yes is the answer. Linux is The Question. - Neo
Reply to: