Bug#337314: marked as done (apt-get build-dep does not pull build-essential)
Your message dated Fri, 4 Nov 2005 07:24:42 -0800
with message-id <20051104152440.GC17525@alcor.net>
and subject line Bug#337314: apt-get build-dep does not pull build-essential
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Nov 2005 20:19:25 +0000
>From lschiere@users.sf.net Thu Nov 03 12:19:25 2005
Return-path: <lschiere@users.sf.net>
Received: from server1.schierer.org (mail.schierer.org) [69.44.156.49]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EXlYT-00016l-00; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 12:19:25 -0800
Received: (qmail 3444 invoked by uid 1002); 3 Nov 2005 15:19:24 -0500
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20051103201924.3443.qmail@mail.schierer.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Luke Schierer <lschiere@users.sf.net>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: apt-get build-dep does not pull build-essential
Reply-To: lschierer@tamos.net
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 15:19:24 -0500
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: apt
Version: 0.5.28.6
Severity: wishlist
In walking a user through compiling gaim, it came to my attention
that apt-get build-dep gaim does not pull and install
build-essential, without at least some of which the compile will
fail. I asked robot101 about this, and was told that "every package
has an implicit build dependency on build-essential," and that if I
want this to change, to become an explicit dependency, or at least to
have the build-dep command check to ensure build-essential is
installed, that I should file a wishlist bug against apt.
Luke Schierer
Gaim support
-- Package-specific info:
-- apt-config dump --
APT "";
APT::Architecture "i386";
APT::Build-Essential "";
APT::Build-Essential:: "build-essential";
APT::Default-Release "stable";
Dir "/";
Dir::State "var/lib/apt/";
Dir::State::lists "lists/";
Dir::State::cdroms "cdroms.list";
Dir::State::userstatus "status.user";
Dir::State::status "/var/lib/dpkg/status";
Dir::Cache "var/cache/apt/";
Dir::Cache::archives "archives/";
Dir::Cache::srcpkgcache "srcpkgcache.bin";
Dir::Cache::pkgcache "pkgcache.bin";
Dir::Etc "etc/apt/";
Dir::Etc::sourcelist "sources.list";
Dir::Etc::vendorlist "vendors.list";
Dir::Etc::vendorparts "vendors.list.d";
Dir::Etc::main "apt.conf";
Dir::Etc::parts "apt.conf.d";
Dir::Etc::preferences "preferences";
Dir::Bin "";
Dir::Bin::methods "/usr/lib/apt/methods";
Dir::Bin::dpkg "/usr/bin/dpkg";
DPkg "";
DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs "";
DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs:: "if dpkg -s apt-listbugs | grep -q '^Status: .* ok installed'; then /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || ( test $? -ne 10 || exit 10; echo 'Warning: apt-listbugs exited abnormally, hit enter key to continue.' 1>&2 ; read a < /dev/tty ); fi";
DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs:: "/usr/bin/apt-listchanges --apt || test $? -ne 10";
DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs:: "/usr/sbin/dpkg-preconfigure --apt || true";
DPkg::Tools "";
DPkg::Tools::Options "";
DPkg::Tools::Options::/usr/bin/apt-listchanges "";
DPkg::Tools::Options::/usr/bin/apt-listchanges::Version "2";
DPkg::Post-Invoke "";
DPkg::Post-Invoke:: "if [ -x /usr/bin/debsums ]; then /usr/bin/debsums --generate=nocheck -sp /var/cache/apt/archives; fi";
DPkg::Post-Invoke:: "if [ -x /usr/sbin/localepurge ] && [ $(ps w -p $PPID | grep -c remove) != 1 ]; then /usr/sbin/localepurge; else exit 0; fi";
-- /etc/apt/preferences --
Package: *
Pin: release a=stable
Pin-Priority: 700
Package: *
Pin: release a=testing
Pin-Priority: 650
Package: *
Pin: release a=unstable
Pin-Priority: 600
-- /etc/apt/sources.list --
# Main
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian/ stable main non-free contrib
deb http://mirrors.kernel.org/debian stable main non-free contrib
deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US stable/non-US main contrib non-free
# Source
deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian/ stable main non-free contrib
deb-src http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US stable/non-US main contrib non-free
# Security
deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main contrib non-free
#testing
deb http://mirrors.kernel.org/debian testing main non-free contrib
deb-src http://mirrors.kernel.org/debian testing main non-free contrib
deb http://secure-testing.debian.net/debian-secure-testing etch/security-updates main contrib non-free
deb-src http://secure-testing.debian.net/debian-secure-testing etch/security-updates main contrib non-free
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (650, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory
UTF-8)
Versions of packages apt depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.5-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-13 GCC support library
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-13 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
-- debconf information:
perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
LANGUAGE = (unset),
LC_ALL = (unset),
LC_TIME = "%a %b %e %H:%M:%S %Z %Y",
LANG = "en_US.UTF-8"
are supported and installed on your system.
perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C").
locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 337314-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Nov 2005 15:27:43 +0000
>From mdz@debian.org Fri Nov 04 07:27:43 2005
Return-path: <mdz@debian.org>
Received: from mta3.adelphia.net [68.168.78.181]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EY3Tj-0007J9-00; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 07:27:43 -0800
Received: from mizar.alcor.net ([68.66.78.251]) by mta11.adelphia.net
(InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP
id <20051104152510.IZHF19306.mta11.adelphia.net@mizar.alcor.net>;
Fri, 4 Nov 2005 10:25:10 -0500
Received: by mizar.alcor.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 892A73C8DC; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 07:24:54 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 07:24:42 -0800
From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org>
To: lschierer@tamos.net, 337314-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#337314: apt-get build-dep does not pull build-essential
Message-ID: <20051104152440.GC17525@alcor.net>
References: <[🔎] 20051103201924.3443.qmail@mail.schierer.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20051103201924.3443.qmail@mail.schierer.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: 337314-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 03:19:24PM -0500, Luke Schierer wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.5.28.6
> Severity: wishlist
>
>
> In walking a user through compiling gaim, it came to my attention
> that apt-get build-dep gaim does not pull and install
> build-essential, without at least some of which the compile will
> fail. I asked robot101 about this, and was told that "every package
> has an implicit build dependency on build-essential," and that if I
> want this to change, to become an explicit dependency, or at least to
> have the build-dep command check to ensure build-essential is
> installed, that I should file a wishlist bug against apt.
It does, and has since version 0.5.5. See bug #148879.
--
- mdz
Reply to: