Bug#282918: apt-preferences(5), wrong example?

[Marc Haber <mh+debian-bugs@zugschlus.de>]

Package: apt
Version: 0.5.27
Severity: minor

Hi,

apt_preferences(5) says:
          The following record assigns a high priority to all package versions
          belonging to any release whose Archive name is  "stable" and  whose
          release Version number is "3.0".

          Package: *
          Pin: release a=unstable, v=3.0
          Pin-Priority: 50

Doesn't the example code have the wrong a= field and a too low
priority? Frankly, this looks like a cut&paste error, or I have
misunderstood how pinning works.

Greetings
Marc

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8.1-vash
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages apt depends on:
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1                     1:4.0-0pre0  GCC support library
ii  libstdc++5                  1:3.3.5-2    The GNU Standard C++ Library v3

-- no debconf information