Bug#190086: marked as done (apt-get [ hold | unhold ] <package>)
Your message dated Tue, 6 Apr 2004 18:53:32 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <Pine.LNX.4.58.0404061853180.13832@gradall.private.brainfood.com>
and subject line Bug#242466: 'Hold Package' command for apt-get
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Apr 2003 22:41:32 +0000
>From radel@inet.net.nz Mon Apr 21 17:41:31 2003
Return-path: <radel@inet.net.nz>
Received: from jozlin.snap.net.nz [202.37.101.35]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 197jyd-00012t-00; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 17:41:31 -0500
Received: from p1-tnt2.snap.net.nz ([202.124.104.1] helo=mypc)
by jozlin.snap.net.nz with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 197jyb-0007Y1-00
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 10:41:30 +1200
Message-ID: <003101c30857$10c18200$01687cca@mypc>
From: "D & E Radel" <radel@inet.net.nz>
To: <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: apt-get [ hold | unhold ] <package>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 10:40:50 +1200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 1
X-MSMail-Priority: High
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT_OE,
X_MSMAIL_PRIORITY_HIGH,X_PRIORITY_HIGH
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: apt
Severity: wishlist
Hi apt-team
I love apt. However, putting packages on hold and off hold again seems a tedious
task from the commandline. Using "dpkg --get-selections" and
"dpkg --set-selections" can be a pain. Please could your team consider
implementing something like this:
apt-get [hold|unhold] <package>
or apt-hold [t|f] <package>
Thanks in advance.
D.Radel.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 242466-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Apr 2004 23:50:07 +0000
>From doogie@debian.org Tue Apr 06 16:50:07 2004
Return-path: <doogie@debian.org>
Received: from brown.brainfood.com (gradall.private.brainfood.com) [146.82.138.61]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BB0KV-0002hf-00; Tue, 06 Apr 2004 16:50:07 -0700
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=adam)
by gradall.private.brainfood.com with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1BB0No-0006sE-00; Tue, 06 Apr 2004 18:53:32 -0500
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2004 18:53:32 -0500 (CDT)
From: Adam Heath <doogie@debian.org>
X-X-Sender: adam@gradall.private.brainfood.com
To: Hansel Dunlop <hansel@interpretthis.org>, 242466-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#242466: 'Hold Package' command for apt-get
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 40731500.2010703@interpretthis.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0404061853180.13832@gradall.private.brainfood.com>
References: <[🔎] 40731500.2010703@interpretthis.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 242466-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Scores: 1
On Wed, 7 Apr 2004, Hansel Dunlop wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.5.24
> Severity: wishlist
>
> I think apt-get should have a command 'hold' that does all the work of
> outputting, editting and re-reinputting. ie a command that does the work
> of dpkg --get-selections > selections; vi selections; dpkg
> --set-selections < selections.
echo pkg hold | dpkg --set-selections
Reply to: