[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#285437: marked as done (apt: Refuses to upgrade to new version)



Your message dated Mon, 13 Dec 2004 02:47:49 -0800
with message-id <20041213104749.GB7393@alcor.net>
and subject line Bug#285437: apt: Refuses to upgrade to new version
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Dec 2004 09:18:30 +0000
>From anders@netinsight.se Mon Dec 13 01:18:30 2004
Return-path: <anders@netinsight.se>
Received: from ernst.netinsight.se [212.247.11.2] 
	by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CdmLe-000842-00; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 01:18:30 -0800
Received: from sid.netinsight.se (unverified [10.100.1.25]) by ernst.netinsight.se
 (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id <B0004428837@ernst.netinsight.se>;
 Mon, 13 Dec 2004 10:17:47 +0100
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=anders)
	by sid.netinsight.se with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CdmKx-0003R5-6F
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 10:17:47 +0100
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 10:17:46 +0100 (CET)
Message-Id: <[🔎] 20041213.101746.-1738017598.anders@netinsight.se>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: apt: Refuses to upgrade to new version
X-Debbugs-CC: Anders =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bostr=F6m?= <anders@netinsight.se>
From: Anders =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bostr=F6m?= <anders@netinsight.se>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
	X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: apt
Version: 0.5.27
Severity: normal

apt-get sometimes refuses to upgrade some packages to the latest
version in testing, even if newer versions exists and apt-cache policy
confirms that. Take a look at this:

sid:~# apt-get update
Hit http://bach.hpc2n.umu.se unstable/main Packages
Hit http://bach.hpc2n.umu.se unstable/main Release                             
Hit http://bach.hpc2n.umu.se unstable/contrib Packages                         
Hit http://bach.hpc2n.umu.se unstable/contrib Release                          
Hit http://bach.hpc2n.umu.se unstable/non-free Packages                        
Hit http://bach.hpc2n.umu.se unstable/non-free Release                         
Hit http://www.tux.org unstable/non-free Packages                              
Hit http://www.tux.org unstable/non-free Release                               
Hit http://http.us.debian.org unstable/main Sources                            
Hit http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org testing/main Packages
Hit http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org testing/main Release
Hit http://http.us.debian.org unstable/main Release          
Hit http://http.us.debian.org unstable/contrib Sources       
Hit http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org testing/contrib Packages
Hit http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org testing/contrib Release
Hit http://http.us.debian.org unstable/contrib Release       
Hit http://http.us.debian.org unstable/non-free Sources      
Hit http://http.us.debian.org unstable/non-free Release      
Hit http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org testing/non-free Packages
Hit http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org testing/non-free Release
Hit http://http.us.debian.org experimental/main Sources      
Hit http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org unstable/main Packages
Hit http://http.us.debian.org experimental/main Release      
Hit http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org unstable/main Release
Hit http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org unstable/contrib Packages
Hit http://http.us.debian.org experimental/contrib Sources   
Hit http://http.us.debian.org experimental/contrib Release   
Hit http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org unstable/contrib Release
Hit http://http.us.debian.org experimental/non-free Sources  
Hit http://http.us.debian.org experimental/non-free Release  
Hit http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org unstable/non-free Packages
Hit http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org unstable/non-free Release
Hit http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org experimental/main Packages
Hit http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org experimental/main Release
Hit http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org experimental/contrib Packages
Hit http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org experimental/contrib Release
Hit http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org experimental/non-free Packages
Hit http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org experimental/non-free Release
Reading Package Lists... Done          
sid:~# apt-cache policy autofs
autofs:
  Installed: 4.1.3-5
  Candidate: 4.1.3-5
  Version Table:
     4.1.3-6 0
         50 http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org testing/main Packages
         50 http://bach.hpc2n.umu.se unstable/main Packages
         50 http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org unstable/main Packages
 *** 4.1.3-5 0
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
sid:~# apt-get install autofs
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
autofs is already the newest version.
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
sid:~# 

Why isn't autofs upgraded???

I have only seen this on amd64 and not on i386.

/ Anders

-- Package-specific info:

-- apt-config dump --

APT "";
APT::Architecture "amd64";
APT::Build-Essential "";
APT::Build-Essential:: "build-essential";
Dir "/";
Dir::State "var/lib/apt/";
Dir::State::lists "lists/";
Dir::State::cdroms "cdroms.list";
Dir::State::userstatus "status.user";
Dir::State::status "/var/lib/dpkg/status";
Dir::Cache "var/cache/apt/";
Dir::Cache::archives "archives/";
Dir::Cache::srcpkgcache "srcpkgcache.bin";
Dir::Cache::pkgcache "pkgcache.bin";
Dir::Etc "etc/apt/";
Dir::Etc::sourcelist "sources.list";
Dir::Etc::vendorlist "vendors.list";
Dir::Etc::vendorparts "vendors.list.d";
Dir::Etc::main "apt.conf";
Dir::Etc::parts "apt.conf.d";
Dir::Etc::preferences "preferences";
Dir::Bin "";
Dir::Bin::methods "/usr/lib/apt/methods";
Dir::Bin::dpkg "/usr/bin/dpkg";
DPkg "";
DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs "";
DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs:: "/usr/bin/apt-listchanges --apt || test $? -ne 10";
DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs:: "/usr/sbin/dpkg-preconfigure --apt || true";
DPkg::Tools "";
DPkg::Tools::Options "";
DPkg::Tools::Options::/usr/bin/apt-listchanges "";
DPkg::Tools::Options::/usr/bin/apt-listchanges::Version "2";

-- /etc/apt/preferences --

Package: *
Pin: release a=unstable
Pin-Priority: 50

Package: *
Pin: release a=experimental
Pin-Priority: 40

Package: *
Pin: release a=testing-proposed-updates
Pin-Priority: 51

-- /etc/apt/sources.list --

# See sources.list(5) for more information, especialy
# Remember that you can only use http, ftp or file URIs
# CDROMs are managed through the apt-cdrom tool.

##################
# testing
##################
#deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/sarge testing main contrib non-free
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64 testing main contrib non-free

##################
# unstable
##################
deb http://bach.hpc2n.umu.se/pure64 unstable main contrib non-free
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64 unstable main contrib non-free

##################
# unstable source
##################
#deb-src http://bach.hpc2n.umu.se/pure64 unstable main
#deb-src http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64 unstable main
deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free
#deb-src http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US unstable/non-US main contrib non-free

##################
# experimental
##################
#deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian ../project/experimental main contrib non-free
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64 experimental main contrib non-free

##################
# experimental source
##################
deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian experimental main contrib non-free

##################
# other
##################

# BlackDown Java Linux
#deb http://ftp.tux.org/pub/java/debian testing main non-free
#deb http://ftp.tux.org/pub/java/debian unstable main non-free
deb http://www.tux.org/pub/java/debian unstable non-free
# deb ftp://ftp.tux.org/pub/java/debian testing non-free

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (ignored: LC_ALL set to sv_SE)

Versions of packages apt depends on:
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1                     1:3.4.2-3    GCC support library
ii  libstdc++5                  1:3.3.5-1    The GNU Standard C++ Library v3

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 285437-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Dec 2004 10:45:33 +0000
>From mdz@debian.org Mon Dec 13 02:45:33 2004
Return-path: <mdz@debian.org>
Received: from mta9.adelphia.net [68.168.78.199] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1Cdnht-0004FW-00; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 02:45:33 -0800
Received: from mizar.alcor.net ([69.167.148.207]) by mta9.adelphia.net
          (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with ESMTP
          id <20041213104502.EVHW14438.mta9.adelphia.net@mizar.alcor.net>;
          Mon, 13 Dec 2004 05:45:02 -0500
Received: by mizar.alcor.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id ABBE0E9402; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 02:47:49 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 02:47:49 -0800
From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org>
To: Anders =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bostr=F6m?= <anders@netinsight.se>,
	285437-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#285437: apt: Refuses to upgrade to new version
Message-ID: <20041213104749.GB7393@alcor.net>
References: <[🔎] 20041213.101746.-1738017598.anders@netinsight.se>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20041213.101746.-1738017598.anders@netinsight.se>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: 285437-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 10:17:46AM +0100, Anders Boström wrote:

> sid:~# apt-cache policy autofs
> autofs:
>   Installed: 4.1.3-5
>   Candidate: 4.1.3-5
>   Version Table:
>      4.1.3-6 0
>          50 http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org testing/main Packages
>          50 http://bach.hpc2n.umu.se unstable/main Packages
>          50 http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org unstable/main Packages
>  *** 4.1.3-5 0
>         100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
> [...]
> Why isn't autofs upgraded???

Because you told apt not to upgrade it.

> -- /etc/apt/preferences --
> 
> Package: *
> Pin: release a=unstable
> Pin-Priority: 50

50 < 100

-- 
 - mdz



Reply to: