On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 05:15:44PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > E: Some broken packages were found while trying to process build-dependencies for subversion. > > OK, the message is essentially correct then. Each build-dependency is > individually satisfiable, but the overall relationship is broken due to the > dependencies of these packages. If you can think of a better way to express > that idea in a short message, I'm open to suggestions. E: Build dependencies for subversion are not satisfiable. And then maybe print that blurb about how packages may need to be moved out of incoming. A user might interpret "broken packages" to mean that something is wrong with his system. > This happened with your sources (and not with, say, unstable alone) because > you have a real (non-virtual) apache2-dev in your sources.list, but it's not > compatible with the other apache stuff which is required. Right. > > You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to correct these. > > It's only this message which is completely bogus; apt-get -f install isn't > going to fix this situation. Okay. -- G. Branden Robinson | It's not a matter of alienating Debian GNU/Linux | authors. They have every right to branden@debian.org | license their software however we http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | like. -- Craig Sanders
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature