Bug#195018: Woody's default APT::Cache-limit too small to upgrade
Scripsit Matt Zimmerman
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 06:18:53AM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
> > FWIW, this seems to be close to happening now. I just got hit with it
> > on a freshly installed woody system with the following sources.list,
> Your test uses the sum of woody+unstable. We only have a real problem if
> sarge (alone) is too large, which I do not think is even close to being true
> at this time.
Hm, you're right. My mental model of an upgrade with apt involved
having both of the old and the new release in sources.list while the
upgrade took place -- but of course this will not be true for people
upgrading a former "stable" to a current one. Sorry for the confusion.
--
Henning Makholm "You propose to avoid dying? I will be
interested to hear the method you plan for this endeavour."
Reply to: