Bug#131623: marked as done (apt: apt should include a sane defaulte /etc/apt/preferences for clueless users)
Your message dated 12 May 2003 20:22:46 +0200
with message-id <1052763765.1893.360.camel@thanatos>
and subject line Fixed in 0.5.5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Jan 2002 02:44:09 +0000
>From tb@mit.edu Wed Jan 30 20:44:09 2002
Return-path: <tb@mit.edu>
Received: from fort-point-station.mit.edu [18.7.7.76]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16W7Cr-0005vq-00; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 20:44:09 -0600
Received: from grand-central-station.mit.edu (GRAND-CENTRAL-STATION.MIT.EDU [18.7.21.82])
by fort-point-station.mit.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id VAA04636;
Wed, 30 Jan 2002 21:44:08 -0500 (EST)
Received: from melbourne-city-street.mit.edu (MELBOURNE-CITY-STREET.MIT.EDU [18.7.21.86])
by grand-central-station.mit.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id VAA11441;
Wed, 30 Jan 2002 21:44:08 -0500 (EST)
Received: from aquinas.becket.net (vp190095.reshsg.uci.edu [128.195.190.95])
by melbourne-city-street.mit.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id VAA08038;
Wed, 30 Jan 2002 21:44:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tb by aquinas.becket.net with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
id 16W7DT-00031h-00; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 18:44:47 -0800
From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@MIT.EDU>
Subject: apt: apt should include a sane defaulte /etc/apt/preferences for clueless users
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10
Message-Id: <E16W7DT-00031h-00@aquinas.becket.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 18:44:47 -0800
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: apt
Version: 0.5.4
Severity: normal
Apt should include an /etc/apt/preferences file giving a sane standardized
configuration for pinning packages.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: Linux aquinas.becket.net 2.4.17 #1 Thu Jan 17 20:07:54 PST 2002 i686 unknown
Versions of the packages apt depends on:
ii libc6 2.2.5-1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii libstdc++2.10- 2.95.4-2 The GNU stdc++ library
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 154224-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 May 2003 19:00:23 +0000
>From jdthood@yahoo.co.uk Mon May 12 14:00:22 2003
Return-path: <jdthood@yahoo.co.uk>
Received: from mars.mj.nl [81.91.1.49]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 19FIX7-0001Yw-00; Mon, 12 May 2003 14:00:21 -0500
Received: (qmail 21968 invoked from network); 12 May 2003 19:00:16 -0000
Received: from 81-91-5-31-customer.mjdsl.nl (HELO thanatos.localdomain) (81.91.5.31)
by www.mj.nl with SMTP; 12 May 2003 19:00:16 -0000
Received: from localhost (thanatos [127.0.0.1])
by thanatos.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id C892910DF30
for <154224-done@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 12 May 2003 20:22:46 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Fixed in 0.5.5
From: Thomas Hood <jdthood@yahoo.co.uk>
To: 154224-done@bugs.debian.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization:
Message-Id: <1052763765.1893.360.camel@thanatos>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4
Date: 12 May 2003 20:22:46 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: 154224-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_30,USER_AGENT_XIMIAN
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
There is a new apt_preferences file in apt 0.5.5.
The file still has problems. I am about to file a new
bug report about them. While we wait for the page to
be fixed, you can read the revised page at:
http://lists.debian.org/deity/2003/deity-200305/msg00009.html
--
Thomas Hood <jdthood@yahoo.co.uk>
Reply to: