Bug#203741: apt-secure
- To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@debian.org>
- Cc: 203741@bugs.debian.org, Colin Walters <walters@verbum.org>, Isaac Jones <ijones@syntaxpolice.org>, debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Bug#203741: apt-secure
- From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 19:15:18 -0400
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20030908231518.GA30008@alcor.net>
- Mail-followup-to: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@debian.org>, 203741@bugs.debian.org, Colin Walters <walters@verbum.org>, Isaac Jones <ijones@syntaxpolice.org>, debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>
- Reply-to: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org>, 203741@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.1030908155451.7784B-100000@wakko.debian.net>
- References: <[🔎] 20030908141224.GD18829@alcor.net> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.1030908155451.7784B-100000@wakko.debian.net>
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 04:02:46PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> Any sort of query during install isn't going to work so well without much
> bigger changes. Mostly this has to do with the way multiple instances of
> the same package are handled, the various origins are not uniquified and
> it cannot retain the md5sum information to figure out what makes sense.
Hmm, wait, I may have misunderstood here. Does this mean that if two
packages will be considered equivalent even if their md5sums are different?
If so, that is a serious problem for any implementation, prompting or no, is
it not?
--
- mdz
Reply to: