[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#115953: marked as done (apt-get -d install <package> doesn't work as documented)



Your message dated Sat, 22 Mar 2003 03:17:15 -0600
with message-id <1b0425753391$98e89d5b$78b443ff@alcc.qhnn>
and subject line Hi !
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2001 11:04:12 +0000
>From root@westel.hu Wed Oct 17 06:04:12 2001
Return-path: <root@westel.hu>
Received: from gate.westel900.hu [194.176.224.33] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 15toUZ-0006KP-00; Wed, 17 Oct 2001 06:04:08 -0500
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 12:57:41 +0200
From: Janos Holanyi <csani@lme.linux.hu>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: apt-get -d install <package> doesn't work as documented
Reply-To: Janos Holanyi <csani@lme.linux.hu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.30
Message-ID:<15toS5-0007XM-00@gate.westel900.hu>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: apt
Version: 0.5.4
Severity: normal

Hi,

Given the following exceprt from the apt-get(8) manpage:

       -d

       --download-only
              Download  only;  package  files are only retrieved,
              not unpacked  or  installed.   Configuration  Item:
              APT::Get::Download-Only.

and the actual behavior of apt-get, e.g.:

  # apt-get -d install ssh
  Reading Package Lists... Done
  Building Dependency Tree... Done
  Sorry, ssh is already the newest version.
  0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 31  not upgraded.

there is a contradiction: apt-get still wants to install the package.
If it wouldn't want to, it had downloaded the package and had left it in
/var/cache/apt/archives.

There are several ways we could solve this contradiction:

1. make a new apt-get command, e.g.: apt-get deb <package>

2. correct the manpage, e.g.: s/"package  files are only retrieved, not
   unpacked  or  installed."/"the regular install procedure of apt-get(8)
   stops right after retrieving the package. It doesn't retrieve the package
   if it is already installed and if the dependencies are not met."/

3. any more ideas?

Thanks.
BR,

Csan

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux holanyij 2.4.10 #1 Sat Sep 29 02:12:03 CEST 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages apt depends on:
ii  libc6                  2.2.4-3           GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 1:2.95.4-0.011006 The GNU stdc++ library

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 115953-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Mar 2003 21:40:13 +0000
>From shamanoogh@europa.com Fri Mar 21 15:40:12 2003
Return-path: <shamanoogh@europa.com>
Received: from (europa.com) [200.47.142.229] 
	by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18wUFF-0003rx-00; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 15:40:10 -0600
Message-ID: <1b0425753391$98e89d5b$78b443ff@alcc.qhnn>
From: <shamanoogh@europa.com>
To: <115953-done@bugs.debian.org>
Cc: <115953@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Hi !
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 03:17:15 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_NextPart_EF1_7531_CD0AABC5.E3BAFA74"
X-Priority: 3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
Delivered-To: 115953-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.9 required=4.0
	tests=BASE64_ENC_TEXT,NO_REAL_NAME,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,
	      UPPERCASE_50_75,USER_AGENT_OE
	version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: ***

------=_NextPart_EF1_7531_CD0AABC5.E3BAFA74
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


------=_NextPart_EF1_7531_CD0AABC5.E3BAFA74
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64

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------=_NextPart_EF1_7531_CD0AABC5.E3BAFA74--



Reply to: