Bug#140125: marked as done (libc6: problem with upgrade and this package)
Your message dated Sat, 30 Mar 2002 23:00:08 -0500
with message-id <[🔎] 20020331040008.GZ19032@blimpo.internal.net>
and subject line Processed: Re: Bug#140125: libc6: problem with upgrade and this package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Mar 2002 09:40:29 +0000
>From neil@darlow.co.uk Wed Mar 27 03:40:29 2002
Return-path: <neil@darlow.co.uk>
Received: from pc2-bigg2-0-cust101.ltn.cable.ntl.com (ideal.darlow.co.uk) [213.107.35.101]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16q9uv-0008TL-00; Wed, 27 Mar 2002 03:40:29 -0600
Received: from neil by ideal.darlow.co.uk with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 16q9ut-0000Rg-00; Wed, 27 Mar 2002 09:40:27 +0000
From: Neil Darlow <neil@darlow.co.uk>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: libc6: problem with upgrade and this package
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.48
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 09:40:26 +0000
Message-Id: <E16q9ut-0000Rg-00@ideal.darlow.co.uk>
Sender: Neil Darlow <neil@darlow.co.uk>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: libc6
Version: 2.2.5-3
Severity: normal
I attempted to dist-upgrade a potato-2.2r5 system and this package was
marked as an unmet dependency in the upgrade failure.
The failure happened during the upgrade of the locales package.
I had to continue the upgrade with an apt-get -f install. Does this mean
that an upgrade isn't upgrading this package soon engough?
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux ideal 2.4.18-k6 #2 Wed Mar 20 20:26:33 EST 2002 i586
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 140125-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Mar 2002 04:01:01 +0000
>From bmc@visi.net Sat Mar 30 22:01:01 2002
Return-path: <bmc@visi.net>
Received: from arsenal.visi.net (visi.net) [206.246.194.60]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16rWWb-0008S3-00; Sat, 30 Mar 2002 22:01:01 -0600
X-Virus-Scanner: McAfee Virus Engine
Received: from [209.96.247.16] (HELO blimpo.internal.net)
by visi.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.6)
with ESMTP id 21961040; Sat, 30 Mar 2002 22:59:42 -0500
Received: from bmc by blimpo.internal.net with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 16rWVk-00066v-00; Sat, 30 Mar 2002 23:00:08 -0500
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 23:00:08 -0500
From: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@debian.org>
Cc: APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>,
140125-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#140125: libc6: problem with upgrade and this package
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20020331040008.GZ19032@blimpo.internal.net>
References: <[🔎] handler.s.C.10173266442389.transcript@bugs.debian.org> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.1020328111758.29821A-100000@wakko.debian.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.1020328111758.29821A-100000@wakko.debian.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i
Delivered-To: 140125-done@bugs.debian.org
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 11:20:14AM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> Ben,
>
> Both dpkg and APT do not permit things to be installed ahead of their
> dependencies, at the very least you'd get warnings out of dpkg.
>
> Without some kind of transcript nothing can be done, I'd suggest closing
> the bug.
I'm worried about closing it, because this is the second time I have
heard such a report. I'm not sure if this is apt or dpkg ordering things
wrongly, or if we have some sort of dep loop that causes this problem.
I need to do some partial upgrade tests in a chroot to see if I can
reproduce it.
Closing the bug because of vagueness.
--
.------==-=======--------=====------------=-=-----.
/ Ben Collins -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` bcollins@debian.org '
`---=========---====----------==-===-------=--=---'
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deity-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: