On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, =?utf-8?Q?J=C3=BCrgen?= A. Erhard wrote: > This is what I get. Maybe it's important that "links" is not just a virtual > package, but also a real one. Or maybe not. Well, there is just no way a bug like this could have survived 6 years, so I think you have something unusual going on, perhaps your package file does not make the .deb or something like that? Can you reproduce it? Jason