On 00-11-04 Kurt D. Starsinic wrote: > On Sat, Nov 04, 2000 at 04:24:19PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote: > > On 00-11-03 kstar@sri.net wrote: > > > Package: apt > > > Version: 0.3.19 > > > Severity: normal > > > > > This just seems wrong to me: > > > > > % apt-get -s dist-upgrade > > > Reading Package Lists... > > > Building Dependency Tree... > > > The following packages will be REMOVED: > > > xcontrib xcopilot xmanpages xpm4g > > > The following NEW packages will be installed: > > > libxaw-dev libxaw6 libxaw7 xlibs xlibs-dev xutils > > > The following packages have been kept back > > > task-x-window-system-core > > > > Would you please explain what's wrong about this and why especially you > > report this as bug against apt? > If I took this upgrade, I would lose xcopilot (because of a dependency > on xpm4g). Shouldn't apt keep all of these back until there's a version > of xcopilot available that doesn't depend on xpm4g? That's what I've grown > to expect, and what I would want. How should apt be able to do this. I tries to resolve all dependencies and does only stop when there a certain dependency problems. I think it would be the wrong way to patch apt to handle such a problem. Those problems occur because you use unstable, where currently a big upgrade to Xfree4 is going on. So to force apt to handle such problems is the wrong way. If you use unstable you should always be aware, that such a problem mayb occur especially if there's just a big X-Update going on. Look at the dependencies of the packages that should be removed and you should be able to see why it would have been. I think apt is handling the situation exactly as it should be. Ciao Christian -- Debian Developer and Quality Assurance Team Member 1024/26CC7853 31E6 A8CA 68FC 284F 7D16 63EC A9E6 67FF 26CC 7853
Attachment:
pgpZnqLICjz1M.pgp
Description: PGP signature