debug msg "holding back <pkg> rather than change <virtpkg>"
(I'm not subscribed to the list, please CC me any replies.)
I'm trying to determine why some package marked for installation
aren't being installed when I run apt-get dselect-upgrade. My C++
isn't so hot these days, so I would appreciate any help. My
understanding is that if A depends on B | C, and B is a real package,
apt-get shouldn't have a problem with it. I don't think I should have
to specify B as 'install' to dpkg --set-selections if it is a
dependancy of A and A *is* flagged as 'install'. Here's an example:
Running with the pkgproblemresolver on, I get
messages for the packages in question of the form of
Package at has broken dep on localcfg-at-base
Considering localcfg-at-base 1 as a solution to at 3
Holding Back at rather than change localcfg-at-base
dpkg --get-selections returns the following line for the packages in
question:
at install
apt-cache showpkg at localcfg-at localcfg-at-base returns:
(reformated slightly for readability)
Package: at
Versions: 5:3.1.8-4(/var/state/apt/lists/slink_aptupdate_Packages),
3.1.8-4(/var/lib/dpkg/status),
Reverse Depends:
localcfg-at-base,at
Dependencies:
5:3.1.8-4 - libc6 (2 2.0.7u) mail-transport-agent (16 (null))
smail (16 (null)) mailx (0 (null)) localcfg-at-base (16 (null))
localcfg-at (0 (null)) 3.1.8-4 - libc6 (2 2.0.7u)
mail-transport-agent (16 (null)) smail (16 (null)) mailx (0 (null))
Provides:
5:3.1.8-4 -
3.1.8-4 -
Reverse Provides:
Package: localcfg-at
Versions:
Reverse Depends:
at,localcfg-at
Dependencies:
Provides:
Reverse Provides:
localcfg-at-base 3.1.8-4-0
Package: localcfg-at-base
Versions: 3.1.8-4-0(/var/state/apt/lists/slink_aptupdate_Packages)
(/var/state/apt/lists/slink_cfgpackages_Packages),
Reverse Depends:
at,localcfg-at-base
Dependencies:
3.1.8-4-0 - at (0 (null))
Provides:
3.1.8-4-0 - localcfg-at
Reverse Provides:
This is with apt 0.3.19 running on a slink-based system.
Reply to: