Bug#35506: marked as done (apt: wrong math)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Apr 1999 00:44:42 -0600 (MDT)
with message-id <Pine.LNX.3.96.990411003704.23416M-100000@Wakko.deltatee.com>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Ian Jackson
(administrator, Debian bugs database)
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 1999 16:18:01 +0000
Received: (qmail 18686 invoked from network); 3 Apr 1999 16:17:58 -0000
Received: from cibalia.gkvk.hr (mail@161.53.211.3)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 3 Apr 1999 16:17:58 -0000
Received: from joy by cibalia.gkvk.hr with local (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian))
id 10TTAH-0001KE-00; Sat, 3 Apr 1999 18:20:57 +0200
Date: Sat, 3 Apr 1999 18:20:55 +0200
From: Josip Rodin <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: apt: wrong math
Message-ID: <[🔎] 19990403182054.A2643@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i
Package: apt
Hi,
I use apt 0.3.3, and I ran apt-get update just a few minutes ago.
Look:
joy:/etc/apt# apt-get update
Get:1 ftp://tp1.irb.hr stable/main Packages [490kb]
11% [1 stable/main 438000/490kb 89%] 973b/s 59m39s^
Get:2 ftp://tp1.irb.hr stable/main Release [93b]
Get:3 ftp://tp1.irb.hr stable/contrib Packages [23.3kb]
Get:4 ftp://tp1.irb.hr stable/contrib Release [96b]
Get:5 ftp://tp1.irb.hr stable/non-free Packages [70.3kb]
Get:6 ftp://tp1.irb.hr stable/non-free Release [97b]
Get:7 ftp://tp1.irb.hr stable/non-US Packages [9101b]
Get:8 ftp://tp1.irb.hr stable/non-US Release
Ign ftp://tp1.irb.hr stable/non-US Release
Fetched 593kb in 6m13s (1589b/s)
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
What does that 59 minutes in the third row mean? It sure wasn't ETA...
--
enJoy -*/\*- http://jagor.srce.hr/~jrodin/
Reply to: