Re: Bug#51967: apt: apt-get source is broken
On Sun, 5 Dec 1999, Martin Bialasinski wrote:
>> Reading Package Lists... Done
>> Building Dependency Tree... Done
>> Need to get 0B of source archives.
>> dpkg-source: -x needs exactly one argument, the .dsc
>>
>> [dpkg-source usage message]
>>
>> I do not have the sources in $cwd, somehow apt-get gets this wrong.
* "Jason" == Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ualberta.ca> wrote:
Jason> What files do you have in the current directory?
None.
$ ls -l
total 0
$ apt-get source gnus
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Need to get 0B of source archives.
dpkg-source: -x needs exactly one argument, the .dsc
Debian GNU/Linux dpkg-source 1.6. Copyright (C) 1996
Ian Jackson and Klee Dienes. This is free software; see the GNU
General Public Licence version 2 or later for copying conditions.
There is NO warranty.
Usage: dpkg-source -x <filename>.dsc
dpkg-source -b <directory> [<orig-directory>|<orig-targz>|'']
Build options: -c<controlfile> get control info from this file
-l<changelogfile> get per-version info from this file
-F<changelogformat> force change log format
-V<name>=<value> set a substitution variable
-T<varlistfile> read variables here, not debian/substvars
-D<field>=<value> override or add a .dsc field and value
-U<field> remove a field
-sa auto select orig source (-sA is default)
-i[<regexp>] filter out files to ignore diffs of.
Defaults to: '^.*~$|DEAD_JOE|(?:/CVS|/RCS|/
.deps)(?:$|/.*$)'
-sk use packed orig source (unpack & keep)
-sp use packed orig source (unpack & remove)
-su use unpacked orig source (pack & keep)
-sr use unpacked orig source (pack & remove)
-ss trust packed & unpacked orig src are same
-sn there is no diff, do main tarfile only
-sA,-sK,-sP,-sU,-sR like -sa,-sp,-sk,-su,-sr but may overwrite
Extract options: -sp (default) leave orig source packed in current dir
-sn do not copy original source to current dir
-su unpack original source tree too
General options: -h print this message
Unpack command 'dpkg-source -x ' failed.
Segmentation fault
Ciao,
Martin
Reply to: