[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#46044: marked as done (apt shouldn't do anything to any package, if -d is used.)



Your message dated Wed, 29 Sep 1999 22:20:46 -0600 (MDT)
with message-id <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.990929221915.17386E-100000@localhost>
and subject line Bug#46044: apt shouldn't do anything to any package, if -d is used.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Sep 1999 20:02:54 +0000
Received: (qmail 5656 invoked from network); 26 Sep 1999 20:02:53 -0000
Received: from platon.sgic.fi (root@195.10.139.40)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 26 Sep 1999 20:02:53 -0000
Received: from shakti.kos.su (root@shakti.pp.sgic.fi [195.10.144.110])
	by platon.sgic.fi (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA13512;
	Sun, 26 Sep 1999 23:02:49 +0300 (EET DST)
Received: by shakti.pp.sgic.fi
	via sendmail from stdin
	id <[🔎] m11VKVf-00274RC@shakti.kos.su> (Debian Smail3.2.0.102)
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 26 Sep 1999 23:02:59 +0300 (EEST) 
Message-Id: <[🔎] m11VKVf-00274RC@shakti.kos.su>
From: Tuomas Jormola <tj@sgic.fi>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: apt shouldn't do anything to any package, if -d is used.
X-Reportbug-Version: 0.29
X-Mailer: reportbug 0.29
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 1999 23:02:59 +0300
Reply-To: tj@sgic.fi

Package: apt
Version: 0.3.13
Severity: normal

Hi,

X is a new package that I want to look at.
Y is an installed package that conflicts with X.
I think "apt-get -d install X" shouldn't warn removing Y, though it's made to
download X that WOULD conflict with Y if X was really installed. Currently apt
yells it's going to REMOVE package Y, though it never removes it, which is
correct of course.

Tuomas Jormola <tj@sgic.fi>

-- System Information
Debian Release: potato
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux shakti.kos.su 2.2.12 #1 Sat Sep 18 04:19:13 EEST 1999 i686

Versions of packages apt depends on:
ii  libc6                     2.1.2-4        GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libstdc++2.10             1:2.95.2-0pre2 The GNU stdc++ library            

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 46044-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Sep 1999 04:45:44 +0000
Received: (qmail 15516 invoked from network); 30 Sep 1999 04:45:41 -0000
Received: from async4-7.remote.ualberta.ca (HELO localhost) (mail@129.128.238.64)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 30 Sep 1999 04:45:41 -0000
Received: from localhost [127.0.0.1] (jgg)
	by localhost with smtp (Exim 2.11 #1)
	id 11WXi2-0005v0-00 (Debian); Wed, 29 Sep 1999 22:20:46 -0600
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 22:20:46 -0600 (MDT)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ualberta.ca>
X-Sender: jgg@localhost
To: tj@sgic.fi, 46044-done@bugs.debian.org
cc: APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#46044: apt shouldn't do anything to any package, if -d is used.
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] m11VKVf-00274RC@shakti.kos.su>
Message-ID: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.990929221915.17386E-100000@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


On Sun, 26 Sep 1999, Tuomas Jormola wrote:

> X is a new package that I want to look at.
> Y is an installed package that conflicts with X.
> I think "apt-get -d install X" shouldn't warn removing Y, though it's made to
> download X that WOULD conflict with Y if X was really installed. Currently apt
> yells it's going to REMOVE package Y, though it never removes it, which is
> correct of course.

Download-only is sort of a 'no act' mode of operation, it goes through
exactly the same motions as it normally would except that it doesn't do
the final install step. Thus it makes sense that it shows the packages
that would need to be removed if that new package is installed.

Put another way, someone else might come along and ask for -d to show
packages to remove so they could evaluate if they want to actually
download it in the first place :>

Jason


Reply to: