On Tue, 4 May 1999, Michael Sobolev wrote: > Hmm.. Now I see a different problem. Let's we have a package that have > dependencies like: > > Package: abc > Depends: a, b, c (>= 1.0), c (<< 1.1) > > How can I avoid the second `c' to appear? That you will have to do on your own. There is no way to express a union version space relation with the current depends codes. Jason