Re: Bug#29920: Wish for more verbosity on "has no installation candidate"

To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ualberta.ca>, 29920@bugs.debian.org
Cc: APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#29920: Wish for more verbosity on "has no installation candidate"
From: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@worldvisions.ca>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 22:56:44 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 19981123225644.C19191@worldvisions.ca>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.981123192324.9211L-100000@wakko>; from Jason Gunthorpe on Mon, Nov 23, 1998 at 07:39:02PM -0700
References: <[🔎] 19981123201648.B17839@worldvisions.ca> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.981123192324.9211L-100000@wakko>

On Mon, Nov 23, 1998 at 07:39:02PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:

> It's all fixed in APT v3 (soon to hit experimental)

Well, you certainly win the promptness prize.  Yeesh.

And they say Linux has no tech support :)

Have fun,

Avery

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#29920: Wish for more verbosity on "has no installation candidate"
  - From: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@worldvisions.ca>
- Re: Bug#29920: Wish for more verbosity on "has no installation candidate"
  - From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ualberta.ca>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug#29920: Wish for more verbosity on "has no installation candidate"
Next by Date: Stripping the static lib
Previous by thread: Re: Bug#29920: Wish for more verbosity on "has no installation candidate"
Next by thread: Stripping the static lib
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread