Bug#23877: marked as done (please include apt and autoup in hamm/hamm/upgrade-i386/)
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jul 1998 10:34:50 -0400
with message-id <[🔎] 35AF610A.4E16CF9E@verisim.com>
and subject line Created upgrade-i386
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Ian Jackson
(administrator, Debian bugs database)
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jun 1998 07:42:54 +0000
Received: (qmail 24891 invoked from network); 25 Jun 1998 07:42:54 -0000
Received: from quechua.inka.de (HELO mail.ka.inka.de) (193.197.84.11)
by debian.novare.net with SMTP; 25 Jun 1998 07:42:54 -0000
Received: from uu.inka.de (ms1.ka.inka.de [193.197.84.8])
by mail.ka.inka.de with smtp
id 0yp6gG-00021P-00; Thu, 25 Jun 1998 09:42:52 +0200
Received: (aj@dungeon.inka.de) by uu.inka.de
(S3.1.29.1) id <m0yp6gH-000DkHC>; Thu, 25 Jun 98 09:42 MET DST
Received: from aj by dungeon.inka.de with local (Exim 1.92 #1)
id 0yp6ZH-0000gV-00 (Debian); Thu, 25 Jun 1998 09:35:39 +0200
From: <aj@dungeon.inka.de>
Subject: please include apt and autoup in hamm/hamm/upgrade-i386/
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.1.5
Message-Id: <E0yp6ZH-0000gV-00@dungeon.inka.de>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 09:35:39 +0200
Package: ftp.debian.org,apt,autoup
Version: N/A
i think this is the right location. if people want to get all files they need
to install or burn a cdrom, they should have one source, and not collect the
files from several servers (which might be down or unreachable or ...).
this bug should be either "wishlist" and ignored or marked grave IMO.
andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deity-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: