Re: New APT version
On Fri, 8 May 1998, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > > postponing debian 2.0 to work out bugs in apt. On the other hand,
> > > I've never seen autoup as anything but a hack. Apt also lets people
> > > accomplish the entire bo -> hamm upgrade from inside dselect, which
> > > is much cleaner.
>
> i agree. if apt can do it and is ready in time for testing then we
> should certainly drop autoup and use apt instead.
Well, I suggest you talk to Brian. The testing group should pick a
version and put that in hamm and I'll feature freeze that portion of the
source till we release.
My list of things to do has the following:
#1 Add logging
#2 Parse the arch field (for future use in experimental)
#3 CDROM URIs
None are horribly important, #3 would be nice to have in hamm, but is
tricky to do properly.
Jason
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deity-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: