Re: New Release
>>>>> "Ben" == Ben Gertzfield <che@debian.org> writes:
>>>>> "Jason" == Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca> writes:
Jason> Could we do a new relase soon please? Ben, if possible
Jason> could you compile me a copy on master as well so that it is
Jason> hamm compatible (for ~jgg)
Ben> Hmm..
Ben> [ben@gilgamesh:~/src/apt/deity]% cvs update 4:11PM cvs
Ben> [update aborted]: connect to cvs.debian.org:2401 failed:
Ben> Network is unreachable
Okay, it looks better now.
I'm trying to think how we should do the version numbering:
0.1.8 is for hamm
0.1.9 is for slink
0.1.8hamm is for hamm
0.1.8slink is for slink
other
Which looks best?
--
Brought to you by the letters Y and V and the number 15.
"Mmm.. Soylent Green.." -- Homer Simpson
Debian GNU/Linux -- where do you want to go tomorrow? http://www.debian.org/
I'm on FurryMUCK as Che, and EFNet and YiffNet IRC as Che_Fox.
Reply to: