[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: New Release

>>>>> "Ben" == Ben Gertzfield <che@debian.org> writes:

>>>>> "Jason" == Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca> writes:
    Jason> Could we do a new relase soon please? Ben, if possible
    Jason> could you compile me a copy on master as well so that it is
    Jason> hamm compatible (for ~jgg)

    Ben> Hmm..

    Ben> [ben@gilgamesh:~/src/apt/deity]% cvs update 4:11PM cvs
    Ben> [update aborted]: connect to cvs.debian.org:2401 failed:
    Ben> Network is unreachable

Okay, it looks better now.

I'm trying to think how we should do the version numbering:

0.1.8 is for hamm
0.1.9 is for slink

0.1.8hamm is for hamm
0.1.8slink is for slink


Which looks best?

Brought to you by the letters Y and V and the number 15.
"Mmm.. Soylent Green.." -- Homer Simpson
Debian GNU/Linux -- where do you want to go tomorrow? http://www.debian.org/
I'm on FurryMUCK as Che, and EFNet and YiffNet IRC as Che_Fox.

Reply to: