[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1107954: xfwm4: crashes on ALT+TAB windows switching



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

control: forwarded -1 https://gitlab.xfce.org/xfce/xfwm4/-/issues/867

On Fri, 2025-06-20 at 21:38 +0200, Adam Chyła wrote:
> Hey Yves-Alexis,
> 
> thank you for your response.
> 
> On 20.06.2025 o 08:59, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > Could you report this directly upstream because while I think it might be
> > worth double-checking for division by zero, there's something fishy here
> > (maybe with GDK as you said) and I think upstream would be better to check
> > that.
> 
> Reported to the upstream: https://gitlab.xfce.org/xfce/xfwm4/-/issues/867
> 
> 
Thanks!

> On 20.06.2025 o 08:59, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > Also not that in my case the monitor_width seems wrong (1920×1080 is the
> > size
> > of my laptop display but I'm currently docked to a 3840x2160 display which
> > should be used for the calculation).
> 
> This seems to be intentional, the code selects the minimum screen width:

Ah good point. Not sure why because here the laptop screen is *disabled* (so I
think shouldn't be used when calculating a size for display).
> 
> 
> 
> On 20.06.2025 o 08:59, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> >  Maybe it's something similar for you (in case you have a smaller display
> > attached)?
> 
> Unfortunately, this is not my case. I don't have a smaller display.
> 
So yeah there's definitely something fishy with a monitor size of 103px. Maybe
a scaling issue (I noticed somewhere that the Scaling factor is used).

Regards,
- -- 
Yves-Alexis
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE8vi34Qgfo83x35gF3rYcyPpXRFsFAmhWYIAACgkQ3rYcyPpX
RFsJoAf/d+CmgKy52JqOe2tztu9kj06SwuFHcm4Co8NhTwLFIZfoWRLO3sr7cyZN
YO8NOSq0e12XI/2QQe2MdDFhnSOv5LUeV/lgqCeLMhr4S58siuiQIIQz9tzI1M1L
y58RNI0utYSU2lXXV6Rb/Bvzh3R4eSA+TzA6aYJxQUtv50ucec/ZxFeXqw8wET6T
ibROlD3D1yLtP1jSugGZQT28abpC2BAl4iU/qnEzCjXO2rK+yLqZex1tmzW517HD
ygH83vGwlraR/xJCz7NLSj51lmCDq3lNR4aqOOHqUSOTuCW0llE6Cr+1oKaYwc7a
oEUxDx7RJx64oM+o7qz+wAbqlpe7WQ==
=g1uF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: