[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1095158: marked as done (lightdm: Add tag x11::display-manager to lightdm package)

Your message dated Wed, 05 Feb 2025 21:37:33 +0100
with message-id <38bab55eb3865eb62c028f0e49674ff8869f496b.camel@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1095158: lightdm: Add tag x11::display-manager to lightdm package
has caused the Debian Bug report #1095158,
regarding lightdm: Add tag x11::display-manager to lightdm package
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1095158: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1095158
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: lightdm
Version: 1.32.0-6+b1
Severity: minor
X-Debbugs-Cc: wesley@schwengle.net

Dear Maintainer,

I was looking into something for an ansible role I'm using and want to find out
al the display managers, I found that most use/have the tag
x11::display-manager.

When searching on the tag with aptitude:

aptitude search ~Gx11::display-manager

I failed to see lightdm in there. By adding the tag it aptitude would be able
to find lightdm.

My question/request is, could you add the tag?

Many thanks!
Wesley



-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (900, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (100, 'experimental'), (10, 'stable-updates'), (10, 'stable-security'), (10, 'oldstable-security'), (10, 'oldoldstable'), (10, 'stable'), (10, 'oldstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 6.12.11-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages lightdm depends on:
ii  adduser                                3.137
ii  dbus                                   1.16.0-1
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]                  1.5.89
ii  libaudit1                              1:4.0.2-2+b1
ii  libc6                                  2.40-6
ii  libgcrypt20                            1.11.0-7
ii  libglib2.0-0t64                        2.82.4-2
ii  libpam-systemd [logind]                257.2-3
ii  libpam0g                               1.7.0-2
ii  libxcb1                                1.17.0-2+b1
ii  libxdmcp6                              1:1.1.5-1
ii  lightdm-gtk-greeter [lightdm-greeter]  2.0.9-1

Versions of packages lightdm recommends:
ii  xserver-xorg  1:7.7+24

Versions of packages lightdm suggests:
ii  accountsservice  23.13.9-7
ii  upower           1.90.7-1
pn  xserver-xephyr   <none>

-- Configuration Files:
/etc/lightdm/lightdm.conf changed [not included]

-- debconf-show failed

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

control: tag -1 wontfix

On Wed, 2025-02-05 at 21:23 +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 09:18:14PM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA256
> > 
> > On Tue, 2025-02-04 at 11:35 -0400, Wesley Schwengle wrote:
> > > My question/request is, could you add the tag?
> > 
> > Why not but:
> > - - is the tag system still used/relevant?
> 
> No, cf #1094655

Thanks Chris.

Wesley, I'm closing the bug because of the above. Not sure if there's a
replacement for the tag system though.

Regards,
- -- 
Yves-Alexis
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE8vi34Qgfo83x35gF3rYcyPpXRFsFAmejzA0ACgkQ3rYcyPpX
RFsa5gf/Vnisr5rPuvq6fxiqvZdb/CcYWQfPqG52RK5SD4W32nYjS0F81c/8PWaY
xSo226KUHkbBgb8tG0R8FBHQuYowRBiXX+pSc2dV4G86fYizV9w3CDjqKvl2fSe4
nkT54GzXtJ36tGmA5ab0rx0/NVWZLHfTF34YJNIMlmQGnWjHQi0ZxuNB/L/6nnp8
LuXscrhzHyp+hqT9lhj5jwmhjVaufUyuKdR2iTy2u7AmRXKFbiyOKw323KWT59ky
0K7Au5/AtgNoY17f/uoq+SbwLQB7BSu+XaTUpGOwzR9YRJHO96HoIWGRhQ639hcj
v3biW8H8gn8iysLQ0ejYw9wV71U5eA==
=kTvG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: