Bug#1093378: xfce4-session: xflock4 now uses gdbus without depending on libglib2.0-bin
Package: xfce4-session
Version: 4.20.0-1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: kaduk@mit.edu
It looks like upstream 4.19.1 changed xflock4 from getting a lock command via
xfconf-query to using a D-Bus method to lock the screen. This means it calls
gdbus directly, but gdbus is in libglib2.0-bin which is not listed in
debian/control at all. Indeed, it's not installed on my system at all, so
locking the screen by menu or xflock4 directly does nothing (locking screen by
timeout does work).
I had considered making this 'serious' but xfce4-session does many things
other than locking the screen so maybe 'important' is right.
-Ben
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers stable-security
APT policy: (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 6.12.9-amd64 (SMP w/12 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages xfce4-session depends on:
ii libatk1.0-0t64 2.55.0.1-1
ii libc6 2.40-5
ii libcairo-gobject2 1.18.2-2
ii libcairo2 1.18.2-2
ii libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-0 2.42.12+dfsg-1+b1
ii libglib2.0-0t64 2.82.4-2
ii libgtk-3-0t64 3.24.43-5
ii libgtk-layer-shell0 0.8.2-1+b1
ii libice6 2:1.1.1-1
ii libpango-1.0-0 1.56.0-3
ii libpolkit-gobject-1-0 126-1
ii libsm6 2:1.2.4-1
ii libx11-6 2:1.8.10-2
ii libxfce4ui-2-0 4.20.0-1
ii libxfce4util7 4.20.0-1
ii libxfce4windowing-0-0 4.20.0-1
ii libxfconf-0-3 4.20.0-1
ii x11-xserver-utils 7.7+11
ii xfce4-settings 4.20.0-2
ii xfconf 4.20.0-1
Versions of packages xfce4-session recommends:
ii dbus-user-session [default-dbus-session-bus] 1.16.0-1
ii libpam-systemd [logind] 257.2-1
ii systemd-sysv 257.2-1
ii upower 1.90.7-1
ii xfce4-screensaver 4.18.4-1
ii xfdesktop4 4.20.0-1
ii xfwm4 4.20.0-1
Versions of packages xfce4-session suggests:
pn fortune-mod <none>
pn sudo <none>
-- no debconf information
Reply to: