Bug#1085934: lightdm: No background displayed when user-background = true
- To: "swingrock@hotmail.fr" <swingrock@hotmail.fr>, Mike Gabriel <mike.gabriel@das-netzwerkteam.de>, 1085934@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#1085934: lightdm: No background displayed when user-background = true
- From: Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2024 21:14:53 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 5f6f98f7b36004986c2bd88068003e4f0059a6f9.camel@debian.org>
- Reply-to: Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@debian.org>, 1085934@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <AM6PR02MB3591B9EB2305858FBC51FB53CB512@AM6PR02MB3591.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
- References: <172968688022.14722.3061301631220291234.reportbug@MS-7756> <172968688022.14722.3061301631220291234.reportbug@MS-7756> <38bb5fd20ddd9fa6acf4833bef1e08f68b825823.camel@debian.org> <20241023210116.Horde.WJlMPq8fQeUhCuiw3TKL2rB@mail.das-netzwerkteam.de> <d0aab0a082cba9ef7eb284d8e89727fe32625d3f.camel@debian.org> <20241025075606.Horde.CfLb01agITW6cadg62XhYlK@mail.das-netzwerkteam.de> <172968688022.14722.3061301631220291234.reportbug@MS-7756> <b8663a74d9c5ac3c2bb6cd4f9e8f2c6bf43c5274.camel@debian.org> <20241025080701.Horde.r06uD6IkKi6Q2B9kwJtP_fS@mail.das-netzwerkteam.de> <AM6PR02MB3591DBB5BB026498C0AF1812CB4B2@AM6PR02MB3591.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com> <[🔎] 83d3493dc080e0e421989503bc357f8fc1dca2d7.camel@debian.org> <AM6PR02MB3591B9EB2305858FBC51FB53CB512@AM6PR02MB3591.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com> <172968688022.14722.3061301631220291234.reportbug@MS-7756>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, 2024-11-04 at 19:29 +0100, swingrock@hotmail.fr wrote:
> This is perfectly understandable for users that are aware of what Recommands
> is.
>
> However, even if i know about, i do not have the reflex to look on
> recommanded packages to in order to made "working" a features that is
> enabled as defaut.
>
> I suggest to disable it as default and add an explanation in the config file
> that the feature require AccountsSetting.
Yes, that looks sensible indeed.
Regards,
- --
Yves-Alexis
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE8vi34Qgfo83x35gF3rYcyPpXRFsFAmcrzj0ACgkQ3rYcyPpX
RFsXIwgA6zKTGTTEqNUU2j95sMFp7hTmHuOXOrPTOU1hHsLav2PUsaG7RNvvEadY
kB0kijDft+a+9xi6X/hqB4CgNCJTIYfQw5L6i13E3tqkQzX0VNLoUxQCm1iHJY9o
SOObwzgvRwmWrAMfdhQ5HjSRS8+2cx3wJXjTnQ0QeZWVMVboaigUwrTPSrCuHSvB
mp9fJFzw1ofSUjPlwkrzYFRczMbNh/7VDRDkWvp1ftFZx7jj2GuwKsIFLFWEvsaE
NET4R9exoihNEpaQhj3wx1ERGriStWhr6tDwqphuFaKt4fF/JJPomuv/iLYI+KDw
uHo+74LNHY8HVUgb+tAUFLyRPVg6mw==
=9g2N
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: