[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1036819: marked as done (xfce4-panel: Clock plugin is 1 second behind reality)



Your message dated Tue, 04 Jul 2023 21:31:03 +0200
with message-id <14f162d5844f84c86154c10f3fc110a8e91baa08.camel@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1036819: xfce4-panel: Clock plugin is 1 second behind reality
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036819,
regarding xfce4-panel: Clock plugin is 1 second behind reality
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1036819: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036819
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xfce4-panel
Version: 4.18.2-1
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

xfce4-panel's Clock plugin has a delay of 1 second.  A comparison with
"xclock -digital -update 1" confirms it.

   * What led up to the situation?
I simply set the Clock plugin to display seconds. Xfce 4.16's DateTime plugin, as shipped with Bullseye, did not have this problem.
   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
     ineffective)?
Changing the plugin's settings did not fix the problem.
   * What was the outcome of this action?
The Clock plugin displays the time with a 1-second delay.
   * What outcome did you expect instead?
I expected the Clock plugin to display the time accurately without a delay.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.0
  APT prefers testing-security
  APT policy: (500, 'testing-security'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-9-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages xfce4-panel depends on:
ii  exo-utils            4.18.0-1
ii  libatk1.0-0          2.46.0-5
ii  libc6                2.36-9
ii  libcairo2            1.16.0-7
ii  libdbusmenu-gtk3-4   18.10.20180917~bzr492+repack1-3
ii  libexo-2-0           4.18.0-1
ii  libgarcon-1-0        4.18.0-1
ii  libgarcon-gtk3-1-0   4.18.0-1
ii  libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-0  2.42.10+dfsg-1+b1
ii  libglib2.0-0         2.74.6-2
ii  libgtk-3-0           3.24.37-2
ii  libpango-1.0-0       1.50.12+ds-1
ii  libpangocairo-1.0-0  1.50.12+ds-1
ii  libwnck-3-0          43.0-3
ii  libx11-6             2:1.8.4-2
ii  libxext6             2:1.3.4-1+b1
ii  libxfce4panel-2.0-4  4.18.2-1
ii  libxfce4ui-2-0       4.18.2-2
ii  libxfce4util7        4.18.1-2
ii  libxfconf-0-3        4.18.0-2

xfce4-panel recommends no packages.

xfce4-panel suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On Fri, 2023-05-26 at 21:21 -0700, xoddf2 wrote:
> 
> xfce4-panel's Clock plugin has a delay of 1 second.  A comparison with
> "xclock -digital -update 1" confirms it.


Hi,

Up to one second difference on two displays with one second interval looks
totally normal to me: you don't know when the refresh is actually done in both
apps, it's likely not done in real time when the tick is executed. So if one
refresh at the start of the second and the other at the end, you likely have
at most one second difference.

Regards,
- -- 
Yves-Alexis
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE8vi34Qgfo83x35gF3rYcyPpXRFsFAmSkc3gACgkQ3rYcyPpX
RFtlkgf/TuHuW6QUrARZE6u/0/KYk1digAxU75JKs6s2sJ5Tnaec5vvbAUcOAUZf
etOSd+r6bapx26MStR1ZyysZou96HfwX9RAnaDR36eRf6Zn/gH2bgSC5LqOWYEx3
/vvNZrAWGBWOQnAf0qu6OsMSbM7+tNDyl/KrJIpiLChlQhfb0cVnTPmHqMkTHDkf
aB3ThPwkgMBtG0thdNfkwUwu1HV8T+8bU4YNo9ZZOLKTOTYyP46lZj7+3r/mfzEf
lh1dy8ucc0L2Yktn/sinzhjS6z429WyoHRITIGAjjTTTo+i/q2IMQ67CMVVtVUGt
vqtO526WS6GYXdCCyXZ6CL5VzBbKeQ==
=nCOF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply to: