Bug#698279: xfce4-panel: Clock panel shows nothing on hover; clock is blank on digital display
Package: xfce4-panel
Version: 4.12.2-1
Followup-For: Bug #698279
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Dear Maintainer,
Bug may be the same as #81798, Clock turns blank after changing format
settings.
Hovering over the clock area shows nothing on any display setting below.
Changing properties to:
- - digital blanks the clock panel area.
- - LCD works fine to display time
- - analog works fine to display time
- - fuzzy works fine to display time
- - binary works fine to display time
Tooltip format reverts to Custom Format and blank field after any other choice
is entered.
Thanks!
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.2
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-6-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages xfce4-panel depends on:
ii exo-utils 0.12.4-1
ii libatk1.0-0 2.30.0-2
ii libc6 2.28-10
ii libcairo2 1.16.0-4
ii libdbus-1-3 1.12.16-1
ii libdbus-glib-1-2 0.110-4
ii libexo-1-0 0.12.4-1
ii libfontconfig1 2.13.1-2
ii libfreetype6 2.9.1-3+deb10u1
ii libgarcon-1-0 0.6.2-1
ii libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 2.38.1+dfsg-1
ii libglib2.0-0 2.58.3-2+deb10u2
ii libgtk2.0-0 2.24.32-3
ii libice6 2:1.0.9-2
ii libpango-1.0-0 1.42.4-7~deb10u1
ii libpangocairo-1.0-0 1.42.4-7~deb10u1
ii libpangoft2-1.0-0 1.42.4-7~deb10u1
ii libsm6 2:1.2.3-1
ii libwnck22 2.30.7-6
ii libx11-6 2:1.6.7-1
ii libxext6 2:1.3.3-1+b2
ii libxfce4ui-1-0 4.12.1-3
ii libxfce4util7 4.12.1-3
ii libxfconf-0-2 4.12.1-1
xfce4-panel recommends no packages.
xfce4-panel suggests no packages.
- -- no debconf information
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQJIBAEBCgAyFiEEJQZ8vK6BnmDiW8fZyAJ5DhtfJxAFAl337aIUHHJhbHBoQHJh
bHBoa2F0ei5jb20ACgkQyAJ5DhtfJxAJ8w/9FCnmADLIFn83y8YVVWZalZa12oSl
Lbvy4rAi84ZLphaOUILgT+R6ppmrtxXGkzwf1Kc9iyZFZNJbG5GfDu5epRRdSAM3
7uR0KXqDsX6xWXvtPITM1f5ZKTx/+4J4NS1dUJRV9BArLOjHEnI/wM9EmoZ4mI2T
VFqvaxFkXvJDxEVdY4qgQgwIBy7CYOv1hTQh7NrrlcuT+V26najwgoYMNqKEBWTy
nQlK3jpOTwRrhw3h5Rf1x5t+4vfnHOHFJD8HaDMongWCFEpyl26gyDyGvIukaYrV
7iKv5/lA+2r5ChiH3NdHGDNNRJ1ZXA4fM3wU4536cQSGcshaONrKFi8E+d8iTgib
xL33fO+S8WtfydALjfpMVPc8qZE86slNHpBDtKsBIDbrKlOxEDw07xB21rd4KGg2
UMMfWGoA9qRI7i+ZYQF8OmNwjrEVEADv0xBev0QyoNsA0RSewCzRYJozwfb+4L5D
I8n4jwUMInnnLKQNf5EX0zQsFfS5wfCcw8iw4Z8NFNfC9A2DbIbiqB8cd8JlKeqM
+iFSYk2F0jUDEQfOCzaIBNf1QQFZQ4zRA0UiaO529l84OvXveOHvdaJGtdIvOmoD
m4XceE8QuJqw9iHoGbJgPY2nIny61db3BivWWWY59zqbmFWLZk37dWWaae4wn+5L
EibIFAUbML9NOu8=
=j/xW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: