Bug#919348: is it still unfit for Bullseye?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
control: reopen -1
On Sun, 2019-07-14 at 00:44 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> But, in this case, I am very excited that you have a replacement for
> something I find to be hopelessly buggy -- and the replacement seems
> near-perfect. Thus, if you switch, you save a lot of time, and any bit of
> time you save is a bit of time you can spend catering to my other whims. :)
I've done a bit of testing of xfce4-screensaver and *twice* today it
segfaulted on me:
[1544037.932910] xfce4-screensav[4272]: segfault at 200000016 ip 00007819061b801c sp 00007fff9b07d7c8 error 4 in libgobject-2.0.so.0.5800.3 (deleted)[78190618e000+32000]
[1604078.180051] xfce4-screensav[22182]: segfault at 200000016 ip 000079321bc2201c sp 00007ffeac850768 error 4 in libgobject-2.0.so.0.5800.3[79321bbf8000+32000]
I didn't investigated those crashes yet but that doesn't look that good. When
the locker crashes,the session is wide open. When that happen at lid close,
for example, you don't have any feedback.
So I wouldn't push xfce4-screensaver in a stable release right now.
Regards,
- --
Yves-Alexis
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE8vi34Qgfo83x35gF3rYcyPpXRFsFAl0uFi8ACgkQ3rYcyPpX
RFtsnAgAhZlWoV+Y4l+V5l0XBO2V8MBb/PkINU+I1WiwhlTMYpj6y6zF8L3Fe4SU
K4TPnLOVy6jPYEI4PnSikjL30UzemROoEY6kXLb30H5Myyr5LGgmc0vcGcKLgNs0
CFEJkxIbnVAweRGcTG4n0oVA4Wku87KrTVesyLwXU+KZ2UARvUE0cTk002GEYJ+B
6mIyNb58FDqQ5W33PeGeH+awDsNl+JRI99Gh464rRddFngbkiw8pMSNgaCegs0jh
f6B7S7uSiHktsqurW4Mg8lYlx/apqqyWuU1Xnj5DG1cthBlk51cn6Nqn9BUk5Mob
JGS37cCfWZbBJ6Yj9KdN7YdigmcvKw==
=XjcB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: