Bug#931837: lightdm: Depends =~ s/libpam-systemd/default-logind/
Package: lightdm
Version: 1.26.0-5
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
You've just changed Depends from
logind | consolekit
to
libpam-systemd | logind
I assume that you missed the new Policy -- discussed and approved before
Buster, released as a package a few days ago. It standardizes the above
dependency as:
default-logind | logind
which it would be nice if you could change to.
I'm filing as wishlist as there _currently_ are no functional differences
in Debian proper; it matters only because:
* derivatives wouldn't need to patch this package
* libpam-systemd's packaging may change as it has multiarch issues
Thanks for your work so far! Meow.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
APT prefers unstable-debug
APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 5.2.0-00033-ga37b923e2493 (SMP w/64 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)
Versions of packages lightdm depends on:
ii adduser 3.118
ii dbus 1.12.16-1
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.72
ii libaudit1 1:2.8.5-1
ii libc6 2.28-10
ii libgcrypt20 1.8.4-5
ii libglib2.0-0 2.58.3-2
ii libpam-elogind-compat [libpam-systemd] 1.3
ii libpam0g 1.3.1-5
ii libxcb1 1.13.1-2
ii libxdmcp6 1:1.1.2-3
ii lsb-base 10.2019051400
ii slick-greeter [lightdm-greeter] 1.2.4-2
Versions of packages lightdm recommends:
ii xserver-xorg 1:7.7+19
Versions of packages lightdm suggests:
pn accountsservice <none>
ii upower 0.99.10-1
pn xserver-xephyr <none>
-- Configuration Files:
/etc/lightdm/lightdm.conf changed:
[LightDM]
[Seat:*]
display-setup-script=xrandr --output DisplayPort-0 --mode 2560x1600 --output DVI-D-0 --mode 1600x1200 --rotate left --right-of DisplayPort-0
[XDMCPServer]
[VNCServer]
-- debconf information:
* shared/default-x-display-manager: lightdm
lightdm/daemon_name: /usr/sbin/lightdm
Reply to: