[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#925948: marked as done (xfce4-power-manager: Display power management blanking cannot unblank)



Your message dated Fri, 29 Mar 2019 17:57:58 +0100
with message-id <2bfaa3bf855d1acd562f574b894c9367f3eb8163.camel@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#925948: xfce4-power-manager: Display power management blanking cannot unblank
has caused the Debian Bug report #925948,
regarding xfce4-power-manager: Display power management blanking cannot unblank
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
925948: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=925948
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xfce4-power-manager
Version: 1.6.1-1
Severity: grave
Tags: a11y
Justification: causes non-serious data loss

Running Debian testing on Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme, xfce4 desktop
environment.

I wished to have power manager blank my monitor after 1 minute of inactivity if
running on battery. Power manager does successfully blank monitor, but
cannot unblank. Moving the mouse or pressing any keys does not unblank
the monitor. Only way to fix is to hold power button to force a
shutdown.

EDIT: A workaround is to use CTRL + ALT + F<2,3,4,etc> to switch to a
new tty temporarily. Then CTRL + ALT + F1 switches back to xfce, which
will display the unlock screen.

Steps to reproduce:

1. Allow XFCE4 Power Manager to manage display power
2. Set 'Blank after' to One minute.
3. Wait 1 minute. Display blanks, cannot unblank.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (1000, 'testing'), (1000, 'stable'), (750, 'stable'), (50, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages xfce4-power-manager depends on:
ii  libc6                     2.28-8
ii  libcairo2                 1.16.0-4
ii  libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0        2.38.1+dfsg-1
ii  libglib2.0-0              2.58.3-1
ii  libgtk-3-0                3.24.5-1
ii  libnotify4                0.7.7-4
ii  libpango-1.0-0            1.42.4-6
ii  libpangocairo-1.0-0       1.42.4-6
ii  libupower-glib3           0.99.10-1
ii  libx11-6                  2:1.6.7-1
ii  libxext6                  2:1.3.3-1+b2
ii  libxfce4ui-2-0            4.12.1-3
ii  libxfce4util7             4.12.1-3
ii  libxfconf-0-2             4.12.1-1
ii  libxrandr2                2:1.5.1-1
ii  upower                    0.99.10-1
ii  xfce4-power-manager-data  1.6.1-1

Versions of packages xfce4-power-manager recommends:
ii  libpam-systemd               241-1
ii  xfce4-power-manager-plugins  1.6.1-1

xfce4-power-manager suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On Thu, 2019-03-28 at 22:38 -0500, Ed Peguillan III wrote:
> Package: xfce4-power-manager
> Version: 1.6.1-1
> Severity: grave
> Tags: a11y
> Justification: causes non-serious data loss

Hi,

this is actually unrelated to xfce4-power-manager (and the severity is wrong).
It looks like a bad interaction between your graphics driver (likely Intel?)
and light-locker.

There are already too many bugs opened for this issue (#908329, #913062,
#870641 and maybe others) so I'm closing this one.

Sorry, I don't have a good solution for you at that point.

Regards,
- -- 
Yves-Alexis
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE8vi34Qgfo83x35gF3rYcyPpXRFsFAlyeTpYACgkQ3rYcyPpX
RFtkAQf/eP2sKeL6q36c5thuwRH/Mqzv6pvVJoZXjBQeOvkVfTEWiGbQRV9Ijnvx
OV1F7RNYMqS05wgr5ivmd9QhOub/MmfaKteKop1MohHfRXqjQQtXZWS3bH8Kur/6
M7TqV8ymwFT3/jECFdHZIP0kJO8un2Rw1jYL7FGlh3fa+1Yz3Yl+mASdUn6HIfny
4Hl5jRh9PfKW0U3JqB5xkvlROZ2m5P/Qqa03Td3txIz5NeQH12ZqZTlMmDPWyTWn
duD33hcjgzhRSGBLVPHm2GVEY1LL2ph7DsKDrsH/z1gfLxSL/x++wQAmLolprIKq
R+kfUGR1yFB7Fzz7kxTI2T49rJRUOg==
=ERSf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply to: