[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#925935: light-locker: should not run concurrently with xscreensaver

Package: light-locker
Version: 1.7.0-3
Severity: important

Dear Maintainer,

At present light-locker is allowed to coexist with xscreensaver at least
in xfce. The results are mostly harmless on a normal machine, but fatal
in a xterm environment. While xscreensaver functions correclty for xterms
light-locker does not. 

These two should not be allowed to coexist, it should be either one or
the other

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.8
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_GB:en (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages light-locker depends on:
ii  dconf-gsettings-backend [gsettings-backend]  0.26.0-2+b1
ii  libc6                                        2.24-11+deb9u4
ii  libcairo2                                    1.14.8-1
ii  libdbus-1-3                                  1.10.26-0+deb9u1
ii  libdbus-glib-1-2                             0.108-2
ii  libglib2.0-0                                 2.50.3-2
ii  libgtk-3-0                                   3.22.11-1
ii  libpango-1.0-0                               1.40.5-1
ii  libpangocairo-1.0-0                          1.40.5-1
ii  libsystemd0                                  232-25+deb9u9
ii  libx11-6                                     2:1.6.4-3+deb9u1
ii  libxext6                                     2:1.3.3-1+b2
ii  libxss1                                      1:1.2.2-1
ii  lightdm                                      1.18.3-1

light-locker recommends no packages.

light-locker suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

Reply to: