Bug#846278: reference to vt-switch problem?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On Thu, 2019-01-31 at 12:49 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-01-31 at 11:20 +0100, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> > Do you have a reference for a bug report in the bts for this? Or asked
> > slightly differently: are the X maintainers and/or upstream aware of this
> > problem and are tracking it (again I would appreciate a reference).
>
> Hi,
>
> I don't know about any reference on this, in Debian BTS or upstream (maybe
> it
> exists, but I don't know about it).
>
> I think having a minimal reproducer was always a bit problematic and thus it
> might have never been reported.
For what it's worth, it seems that it might not entirely be linked to
lightdm/light-locker. Other people apparently reproduce the same kind of
situation (no backlight, need for a vt-switch) in other environment. It
happens usually with Intel graphics cards and involves suspend/resume cycles
and maybe docking/undocking.
Regards,
- --
Yves-Alexis
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE8vi34Qgfo83x35gF3rYcyPpXRFsFAlxdPyIACgkQ3rYcyPpX
RFvnwAf8ChxwDGWcKO5qk/X94tcSbVpJkARU14EfUORsWL+HpV5da3I8kHvg5XQV
eOAh2u9zEP+/UPr8n2cbtwIwVEzCZAAHJnwX+Nm/rf4lUs5WvJXjdb1XixJjM0gi
bCs8kpON/f7uPNNObSFeirbo9wSrC9UoQ6nwFXSz/8ydRvh2USBwOP6Es6/FEpq9
Gf/nNBlldMNLfi52gmfBG6T9m07BPH3AdKRYBxi3yyxvCxHDOpnBsxz3jXdF7/PR
5uzFF36zrlQR+6rcwXrhDiC2N033c14pGbWIX7Ta6Qw+MT7IYMn220I/7PrjaVhd
EqA2mCRJiJ8CStg+KbJPtpiAxvcCBQ==
=yPmX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: