[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#770885: Bug#770885: lightdm: Restart, Suspend, Hibernate, Shut Down all greyed out and nonfunctional



On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 04:37:23PM +0100, Agustin Martin wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:45:29PM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > On mar., 2014-11-25 at 16:41 -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> > > On 11/25/2014 04:30 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > > >
> > > > What version of cgmanager?
> > > 0.33-2
> > 
> > That should be good.
> > > >> I'm not sure what package to check for policykitd.  There's no package
> > > >> by that name, and packages.debian.org claims there's no file by that
> > > >> name, either. 
> > > >>
> > > > Package name is *policykit*, not policykitd.
> > > >
> > > That package also doesn't seem to be in the repo.  Do you mean
> > > policykit-1?  If so, version 0.105-7 is installed.
> > > 
> > Then I don't know. You could try to boot with systemd to check if that
> > fixes the problem (just use init=/lib/systemd/systemd at boot time).
> > 
> > Can you also check if you do have a registered session with loginctl?
> > 
> > Also it'd help to pinpoint exactly when it stopped working.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Going back to this old bug report, coming from the times where jessie was
> testing/sid.
> 
> This has been fixed in my sid box for a while, but just reappeared in my
> amd64 sysvinit system, apparently after systemd upgrade
> 
> systemd:amd64 (231-10, 232-1)
> libsystemd0:amd64 (231-10, 232-1)
> libpam-systemd:amd64 (231-10, 232-1)
> 
> I will try to track updates to know what will exactly make this problem
> disappear. Other times this problem appeared and disappeared, but never
> tried to track when it disappeared.

Hi, Yves,

Just wanted to let you know about this bug report against systemd-shim

https://bugs.debian.org/844785 [systemd-shim not fully compatible with systemd 232]

It is about the same problem and its severity has been raised to serious.
Will keep tracking it.

Regards,

-- 
Agustin




Reply to: